All categories

3 years ago

Noah drew 22 hearts and 76 circles. What is the ratio of circles to all the shapes?

1 answer:

4 0

You would make a fraction with circles on the top which would be 76. Then you would add 22 to 76 and get 97 because that is the number of all of the shapes. That would mean your fraction would be 76/97. If u want to simplify that is up to you.

You might be interested in

Does anyone know the answer?

meriva

Answer:

2/6

Step-by-step explanation:

there is only two fives with two dice, the dice only have six sides therefore the chances would be two out of five

6 0

3 years ago

Please help me with this :)))

Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

C, 33 1/3%

Step-by-step explanation:

Because there are only two even number that follow this rule: 2<x≥6, and since there are only 6 possible outcomes, the probabilty is 2/6, which is 1/3. In a percent form, this is 100%*2/3, or 33 1/3%.

8 0

3 years ago

Help please rn please help

Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer: the answer is MO=5

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

1 year ago

The pictogram shows information about the numbers of phones sold in a shop over a 5-month period.

OLEGan [10]

Answer:

a) 5(6) = 30

b) 3.5(6) = 21

c) 153

Step-by-step explanation:

c) 30 + 39 + 21 + 36 + 27 = 153

7 0

3 years ago

Many companies use well-known celebrities as spokespersons in their TV advertisements. A study was conducted to determine whethe

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent (P-value = 0.01537).

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>The question is incomplete: the picture attached gives the missing sample data.</em>

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim that is going to be stated in the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent. This means that the proportions differ significantly.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:

$H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0$

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (Male celebrity), of size n1=150 has a proportion of p1=0.273.

$p_1=X_1/n_1=41/150=0.273$

The sample 2 (Female celebrity), of size n2=150 has a proportion of p2=0.407.

$p_2=X_2/n_2=61/150=0.407$

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=-0.133.

$p_d=p_1-p_2=0.273-0.407=-0.133$

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

$p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{41+61.05}{150+150}=\dfrac{102}{300}=0.34$

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

$s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.34*0.66}{150}+\dfrac{0.34*0.66}{150}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.001496+0.001496}=\sqrt{0.002992}=0.055$

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

$z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{-0.133-0}{0.055}=\dfrac{-0.133}{0.055}=-2.44$

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

$P-value=2\cdot P(z$

As the P-value (0.01537) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent (the proportions differ).

6 0

2 years ago