The answer would be hypotheis since its an theory that isnt proven yet which would involve a scientist to expertiment to make the hypothesis true or valid
The percent yield of this reaction is calculated as follows
Mg3N2 + 3H2O =2NH3 + 3Mgo
calculate the theoretical yield,
moles=mass/molar mass
moles Mg3N2= 3.82 g/100g/mol= 0.0382 moles(limiting regent)
moles of H2o= 7.73g/18g/mol = 0.429 moles ( in excess_)
by use of mole ratio between Mg3N2 to MgO which is 1:3 the moles of MgO = 0.0382 x3 = 0.1146 moles
mass =moles x molar mass
the theoretical mass is therefore = 0.1146mole x 40 g/mol = 4.58 grams
The % yield = actual mass/theoretical mass x1000
= 3.60/4.584 x100= 78.5%
Answer:
Explanation:
The glass (which does not crystallize even though it is accepted) of a window is NOT a mineral, since it is neither a substance of natural origin (although it is manufactured from natural components) nor does it have a defined crystalline structure, that is, the atoms they are not arranged in an orderly and regular way along axes and planes forming flat faces that keep a symmetry.
Remember that a mineral is defined as a solid, inorganic, homogeneous substance, of natural origin, with a crystalline structure and a determined and well-defined chemical composition within narrow margins and that has regular and characteristic physical properties.
The atomic number defines the number of protons in an atom.
Answer:
Ethanol
Explanation:
Solvent extraction is the process in which a compound transfers from one solvent to another owing to the difference in solubility or distribution coefficient between these two solvents(Science Direct).
We have to remember that oxalic acid will be extracted better into a solvent in which it is more soluble. From the data given; oxalic acid is more soluble in ethanol than in ether.
This simply means that ethanol is a better solvent for extracting oxalic acid from water when compared to ether.
