Answer:
D. Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces, but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not
Explanation:
The genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda are part of the numerous genocides that took place in the past several decades. The genocide in Bosnia was initiated by Serbian nationalist, and it was toward the Muslims and the Croatians. The international community did reacted though to stop it, and sent its military forces in order to put things under control. The genocide in Rwanda though took another course. The Hutu started to perform genocide over the Tutsi minority, but the international community was hesitating should it react or not, if it does in which way, and while it was thinking the genocide was going on and on. Luckily for the Tutsi people, they had their own military forces that were well equipped, so they managed to stop the aggression form the Hutu before they made a full scale genocide.
Answer:
nstrumental variables for incumbents, but not for challengers. 6Intuitively, the greater the number of term-limited Democratic (Republican) representatives residing.
Explanation:
Hope this answer helps you :)
Have a great day
Mark brainliest
Answer:
The confederation of the original 13 colonies into one republic was inspired by the political structure of the Iroquois Confederacy,
Explanation:
Initially, the Iroquois Confederacy comprised of 5 independent states. Before the 1500s, the five Iroquois nations dedicated a lot of resources to battling and harming each other. The cost of the war was heavy and their economies were destroyed. The Great Peacemaker thought how the things between them could be made better and to promote peace among the nations. They moved to each of the five nations to discuss their ideas of unity and peace. This idea eas discussed by the founding father of the U.S and in 1988, the U.S senate paid tribute to Iroquois Confederacy for the inspiration.
For their to be better economy, to have better faster machines, and them to work to together to have a dream work
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there is no link to watch the video and there is no name of the video to search for it, we can say that companies like Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Amazon were/are successful at the time because they were innovative companies that were ahead of their competence. In the case of Sears, the company sent salesmen to offer the catalogs and products of the company and paid special attention to customer satisfaction. That is how Sears could create an emporium, opening new stores in most parts of the United States.
Amazon also was a very innovative company, now, in the modern era of technology. Amazon was a step beyond its competitors, creating a service culture where everything was on time, guaranteeing customer satisfaction, from the transaction online, until the product was delivered at home or office.
