Answer:
y = -3x +2
Step-by-step explanation:
If you divide the equation for the given line by 2, it will be in slope-intercept form:
y = (1/3)x +7
This tells you its slope is 1/3. The slope of the perpendicular line is the negative reciprocal of this: -1/(1/3) = -3. The point-slope form of the equation for the perpendicular line can be written as ...
y = m(x -h) +k . . . . . line with slope m through point (h, k)
Your line is ...
y = -3(x -(-2)) +8
y = -3x +2
The formula in solving the area of a square is Area = a² where "a" is for the length of the side. The area formula in solving a cube is Area = 6a² where "a" is for the length of its side.
Area of square = a²
64 = a²
a = 8 units
Area of cube = 6a²
64= 6a²
a = 3.27 units
The difference of side of the square and side of the cube is shown below:
Difference = 8 - 3.27
Difference = 4.73 units.
The answer is 4.73 units.
The answer is c first 2×6= 12 then 12-5=7
then do -7×-2=14 the minus signs cancel
finaly we have two bracket so we multiply both number (7)×(14)=98
Answer and Step-by-step explanation: Scaterplot is a type of graphic which shows the relationship between to variables. In this question, you want to determine if there is a linear relationship between overhead widths of seals and the weights. So, the hypothesis are:
H₀: no linear correlation;
H₁: there is linear correlation;
In this hypothesis test, to reject H₀, the correlation coefficient r of the data set has to be bigger than the critical value from the table.
With α = 0.05 and n = 6, the critical value is 0.811.
The linear correlation is calculated as:
r = n∑xy - ∑x.∑y / √[n∑x² - (∑x)²] [n∑y² - (∑y)²]
r = 
r = 0.9485
Since r is bigger than the critical value, H₀ is rejected, which means there is enough evidence to conclude that there is linear correlation between overhead widths and the weights.
In the attachments is the scaterplot of the measurements, also showing the relationship.
The answer is c because it makes the most sense