9514 1404 393
Answer:
no solution
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplifying the given equation, you have ...
-6(x -2) +3x = -3(x +3) +21 . . . . . given
-6x +12 +3x = -3x -9 +21 . . . . . . eliminate parentheses
-3x +12 = -3x +13 . . . . . . . . . . . . collect terms
0 = 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . add (3x-12) to both sides
There is no value of x that will make this true.
The equation has NO SOLUTION.
Answer:
9.23712
Step-by-step explanation:
First it asks you to round to the nearest thousandth of 8.23678. So, with decimals it is tenths, hundreths, then thousandths. So the 3rd decimal place. You then will compare look at the 4th decimal place, 7, and compare it to 5. Since 7 is greater than 5, the 3rd decimal space goes up, being 8.237. Now you add the 1.00012 to get 9.23712.
I would live to help but i cannot see the wuestion very well.. mind writting it oit in a commet?
5/8 I hope I helped u out
Answer: Transitive Property of Equality
The Subtraction Property does not apply here, and the Reflexive Property is used to show something is equal to itself (a = a).
Given that ∠VQT is congruent to ∠SQU by the Vertical Angles Theorem and ∠SQU is congruent to ∠WRS by the Corresponding Angles Postulate, ∠VQT is congruent to ∠WRS because of the Transitive Property of Equality.
Basically, Angle 1 = Angle 2, Angle 2 = Angle 3, therefore Angle 1 should also equal Angle 3.
