Given the scenario, Sally's employer is still responsible for these reasons:
<em> A. Yes, because this type of incident falls under the OSH Act's General Duty Clause,
</em>
<em />
<em>B. Yes, because Larry did not follow safe work practices by rushing down the hall with the cart.</em>
The responsibility of Sally's employer does not end because the accident is not specifically addressed in the OSHA standards.
At least, the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act requires employers to provide safe work environments free from recognized present or future hazards.
Thus, Larry's action is a recognized hazard that could have been prevented from happening if wider hallways are built, for example.
Read more about Employer and Employee OSHA Responsibilities at brainly.com/question/20427532
New materials and products and ingredients. innovation, breakthroughs developments.improved production processes and business modules
Answer:
Sean and Jenny
The deductible net loss for the rental of their home is:
= $18,241.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Number of days for rent of $3,000 collected = 40 days
Number of personal use of house = 18 days
Total number of days that the house was in use = 58 days
House Expenses:
Mortgage interest $14,000
Property taxes 3,500
Utilities 1,100
Maintenance 1,300
Depreciation 10,900
Total expenses $30,800
Proportion of house expense:
Rental use = $21,241 (40/58 * $30,800) 69%
Personal use = $9,559 (18/58 * $30,800) 31%
Total expense $30,800
The deductible net loss for the rental of their home is $18,241 ($3,000 - $21,241).
Answer: the highest of the minimum wages.
Explanation:
The company will have the pay the minimum wage that is the highest because they are under the authority of all three governments and paying the highest minimum wage would ensure that they automatically follow the minimum wages set by the other two authorities.
For instance; the federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, the state minimum wage is $10 per hour and the city minimum is $12 per hour. When the company pays $12 an hour, they would be adhering to the city minimum and automatically adhering to the Federal and State minimums as well.
The term that describes the situation where <em>fixed and variable </em><em>expenses</em><em> are higher than</em> net income is <em>D. dissaving.</em>
Dissaving happens when an individual is spending from either previous savings or borrowing to fund current expenses.
Dissaving is commoner with retirees than those currently employed. But it can also happen to currently-employed persons, whose expenses are more than their incomes. They should find strategies to stop the negative saving. Otherwise, their debts may be overbearing in future.
Thus, dissaving means negative saving or <em>spending more than income.</em>
Learn more: brainly.com/question/13954775
