Answer:
See below for answers
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Problem 1</u>
<u />
Therefore, the second option is correct.
<u>Problem 2</u>
<u />
Therefore, the solution set is 
, making the second option correct.
<u>Problem 3</u>
<u />
Therefore, the solution set is 
, making the fourth option correct
Answer:
the first option
Step-by-step explanation:
for a number to be rational, it should be able to be expressed as a fraction. Non terminal decimals must have a repeating pattern. Square roots of random numbers aren’t rational. Just like the first rule with decimals, the third number cannot be expressed as a fraction
Hello !
Okay so what you do is add 10 to the other side
2k - 10 +10 = 6 + 10
You would get ....
2k = 16
Next you divide 16 by 2 which is 8
and that means 8 is equal to k
K = 8
It depends on the given information.
McKenzie's work is correct if the two short sides are given as 5 and 13.
Cara's work is correct is almost correct if 5 is one leg, and 13 is the hypotenuse. The exact answer is 12, but she wrote it as approximately equal. That's her only problem.
By the way, Ddssaa122: when posting questions, the power of a number is written as 5^2 and not 52. If you copy and paste, please make sure you add the caret sign to indicate a power, or else you will suffer by getting a wrong answer. 5^2=5*5, 52=4*13, so they are not the same.
Answer:
-0.24 ; 0.71
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
Mean number of siblings (m) = 3.76
Standard deviation (s) = 3.18
Z score associated with 3 siblings
x = 3
Using the relation :
Zscore = (x - m) / s
Zscore = (3 - 3.76) / 3.18
Zscore = - 0.76 / 3.18
Zscore = −0.238993
Zscore = - 0.24
2.) proportion of respondents with more than 2 siblings
Using the z probability calculator :
X > 2
Obtain the standardized score :
Zscore = (x - m) / s
Zscore = (2 - 3.76) / 3.18
Zscore = - 1.76 / 3.18
Zscore = −0.5534591
Zscore = - 0.55
Using the z table :
P(Z ≥ - 0.55) = 1 - p(Z ≤ - 0.55) ; p(Z ≤ - 0.55) = 0.2912
1 - p(Z ≤ - 0.55) = 1 - 0.2912 = 0.7088 = 0.71
