1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Radda [10]
2 years ago
6

Read each statement then select whether it is true or false.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Marina CMI [18]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

1) true

2) false

3) false

4)True

You might be interested in
What is the length of the arc if: 11. r=10 n=20 A15(pi)/ 7 B13(pi)/ 5 C16(pi)/ 2 D11(pi)/ 4 E 10(pi)/ 9 F 9(pi)/ 4 12. r=3 n=6 A
Vilka [71]

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for arc length [for the angle in degrees] is:

L = 2\pi r \left(\dfrac{n}{360}\right)

here,

n = degrees

r = radius

using this we'll solve all the parts:

r = 10, n = 20:

L = 2\pi r \left(\dfrac{n}{360}\right)

L = 2\pi (10) \left(\dfrac{20}{360}\right)

from here, it is just simplification:

2 and 360 can be resolved: 360 divided by 2 = 180

L = \pi (10) \left(\dfrac{20}{180}\right)

10 and 180 can be resolved: 180 divided by 10 = 18

L = \pi \left(\dfrac{20}{18}\right)

finally, both 20 and 18 are multiples of 2 and can be resolved:

L = \pi \left(\dfrac{10}{9}\right)

L = \dfrac{10\pi}{9} Option (E)

r=3, n=6:

L = 2\pi r \left(\dfrac{n}{360}\right)

L = 2\pi (3) \left(\dfrac{6}{360}\right)

L = \dfrac{\pi}{10} Option (D)

r=4 n=7

L = 2\pi r \left(\dfrac{n}{360}\right)

L = 2\pi (4) \left(\dfrac{7}{360}\right)

L = \dfrac{7\pi}{45} Option (C)

r=2 n=x

L = 2\pi r \left(\dfrac{n}{360}\right)

L = 2\pi (2) \left(\dfrac{x}{360}\right)

L = \dfrac{x\pi}{90} Option (D)

r=y n=x

L = 2\pi r \left(\dfrac{n}{360}\right)

L = 2\pi (y) \left(\dfrac{x}{360}\right)

L = \dfrac{xy\pi}{180} Option (E)

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP I WILL PICK BRAINLIEST
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

A more complex question has rarely been asked.

Principia Mathematica took nearly a thousand pages to prove that 1+1=2. It does meander a bit, but had they wanted to prove 1+1=2 alone, it could have done so in 500 pages.

Mathematically speaking, the definition of 1 is:

There exists a number such that when multiplied upon an element of a specified set, yields the element of the specified set.

It is also defined as:

1.0000000000000000000000…

.9999999999999999999999999…

as the set of all singletons.

a singleton is a set with exactly 1 element.

These 4 definitions work in tandem with one another.

For example:

1=1

Divide both sides by 3.

1/3=1/3

Rewrite.

1/3=.33333333333333333...

Multiply both sides by 3.

1=.9999999999999999999...

Similarly:

If    =.9999999999999999999...

10=9.99999999999999999...

10=9+.99999999999999...

10=9+

Simplify by subtracting x from both sides.

9=9

=1

.99999999999999999999...=1

As the set of all singletons, 1 is also THE element that represents the set of all single entities.

That is to say: if you have 7 erasers. What you really have is a set of 7 single entities. The definition of 7 becomes: 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1; and not as is commonly believed as: 6 + 1.

There is an argument for 7 to be defined as 6 + 1, but this argument is a corollary of the Peano Axioms which in turn argues that there exists a set with absolutely nothing in it {} and a set with exactly something in it {x}. More on this later.

The Principia Mathematica uses Peano's (from the Peano Axioms mentioned earlier) work and notation to expertly slice through the many nuances pertaining to this question.

This is something we will not do; but hopefully, we will also be able to effectively demonstrate why 1 + 1 = 2 in less than 1000 pages.

We will assume these basic principles of number theory:

There exists a number such that when multiplied to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

There exists a number such that when added to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

If we again assume to have only two sets, a set that is empty: {} containing no elements, and a set that is not empty {x} containing an element. We realize that Consequently, we went from nothing {}, to something {x}. This means that {x} is the successor to {}, as the next step up from nothing, is something.

As such we now have two elements:

Nothing, {}, and something that comes after {}, this something is called the successor, and it is the Successor of nothing.

in written notation we have:

{} and { the Successor of nothing }

Rewritten:

{0, the thing that comes after 0}

Further reworded:

{0, Successor (0) }

Reduced further:

0,(0)

Where S(0) stands in place of ‘the successor’. Further, we know there are an infinite number of possible Natural numbers, and we get:

{0, Successor of 0, the successor of the successor of 0, the successor of the successor of the successor of 0,…}

Further reduced:

0,(0),((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

Further explained:

We know that we had nothing, and added something to it, and got something:

Nothing + Something = Successor of nothing.

0+__=(0)

We also know that there is nothing closer to 0, than the thing that comes after 0.

0+(0)=(0)

This implies that S(0) is the smallest increment possible from natural number to next natural number.

As a consequence, we now have two discovered entities: Something, and Nothing.

Let’s give them names.

We have decided that

Nothing = 0 .

0 = Nothing.

S(0) is the something that comes after nothing.

We define a new symbol: 1, to be: 1 = S(0)

This is to say that 1 IS the symbol that succeeds 0;

We could have drawn any shape to define the number that succeeds 0; we chose to draw a 1.

0+(0)=(0)

0+1=(0)

0+1=1

0,1,((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

We now have definitions for 0, and 1. What about a definition for the thing that comes after one? The successor of 1?

As we know S(0) is the smallest increment available, and we are interested in finding S(0)’s successor we investigate:

The successor to the successor of Nothing:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)

This reads:

The successor of the successor of nothing IS the successor of one

And now… we need a new symbol.

We define the

(1)=2

The successor of 1 IS 2.

Thus:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)=2

Simplify:

0+1=1;1+1=(1);(1)=2.

Further:

0+1=1;1+1=2;2=2.

1 has many different properties; but all of the properties and their resulting definitions have little to do with why 1 + 1 = 2. And that 1 + 1 = 2 is a byproduct of properties inherent to Natural numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
A car travels 136 miles using 7 gallons of gas. At that rate, how far can the car travel using 42 gallons of gas?
muminat

Answer:

in 136 miles=7 gallons

?=42 gallon

= 136=7

?=42

cross multiply

136×42=5,712

=5,712÷7=816

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The function f is defined by the following rule
Oxana [17]

Answer:

The answer to your question is given below.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. f(x) = 5x + 1

x = – 5

f(x) = 5x + 1

f(–5) = 5(–5) + 1

f(–5) = –25 + 1

f(–5) = –24

2. f(x) = 5x + 1

x = – 1

f(x) = 5x + 1

f(–1) = 5(–1) + 1

f(–1) = –5 + 1

f(–1) = – 4

3. f(x) = 5x + 1

x = 1

f(x) = 5x + 1

f(1) = 5(1) + 1

f(1) = 5 + 1

f(1) = 6

4. f(x) = 5x + 1

x = 2

f(x) = 5x + 1

f(2) = 5(2) + 1

f(2) = 10 + 1

f(2) = 11

5. f(x) = 5x + 1

x = 2

f(x) = 5x + 1

f(3) = 5(3) + 1

f(3) = 15 + 1

f(3) = 16

Summary

x >>>>>>>> f(x)

–5 >>>>>> – 24

–1 >>>>>> – 4

1 >>>>>>>> 6

2 >>>>>>> 11

3 >>>>>>> 16

8 0
3 years ago
What is the value of x in this equation? Enter your answer in the box.
Alla [95]

Answer: Answer Bellow

Step-by-step explanation: To check yourself, multiply 6.0 x 105 times 4.0 x 103 on your calculator. Your answer should be 2.4 x ...

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is equal C(10,3)?<br><br> a. C(3,10)<br><br> b. C(10,7)<br><br> c. P(10,3)
    11·2 answers
  • How to do this problem
    11·1 answer
  • Does anybody know the answer???
    12·1 answer
  • For a party, you can spend no more than $20 on cakes. Egg cake costs $4 and cream cake costs $2. Write the linear inequality tha
    10·1 answer
  • Quadrilateral DUCK is inscribed in circle O.<br><br> What is the measure of ZK?<br><br> 73
    7·1 answer
  • What is the total amount and the amount of interest earned on $5,000 at 8% for 20 years? Total Amount Interest Amount compounded
    8·1 answer
  • Please i really need help
    8·1 answer
  • Solve x^2+ 8x- 6=0 using the Quadratic Formula
    9·2 answers
  • Please help me solve question 2
    13·2 answers
  • If a galapagos tortoise lives for an average of 180 years how many years. How many years in total will be accumulated for 8 tort
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!