Theoretical probability:
1 ... (16 and 2/3) %
2 ... (16 and 2/3) %
3 ... (16 and 2/3) %
4 ... (16 and 2/3) %
5 ... (16 and 2/3) %
6 ... (16 and 2/3) %
Experimental results:
1 ... 18
2 ... 16
3 ... 16
4 ... 17
5 ... 16
6 ... 17
The total number of rolls in the experiment was
(18 + 16 + 16 + 17 + 16 + 17) = 100
so the expected frequency for each outcome was 16-2/3 times,
and the SIMULATION probabilities were
1 ... 18%
2 ... 16%
3 ... 16%
4 ... 17%
5 ... 16%
6 ... 17%
To me, this looks fantastically close. The cube
could hardly be more fair than it actually is.
Answer:
There are no like terms.
Step-by-step explanation:
Well here is the thing is the answer is 10
Answer:
1. 50
2. 16.6666666667=16.7
3. 5.55555555556=5.6
Step-by-step explanation:
1. 5/0.1=50
2. 5/0.3=16.6666666667=16.7
3. 5/0.9=5.55555555556=5.6
