Answer:
The answer is: $70,000
Explanation:
70% of the total damages equals $70,000 (70% x $100,000)
Comparative negligence refers to a legal defense used by the defendant to reduce the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover. This is based on what percentage of the plaintiff's damages could be attributed to the plaintiff's own negligence.
Answer:
C. A risk averse investor would choose the economy in which stock returns are independent because risk can be diversified away in a large portfolio.
Explanation:
if stock prices move together, (positive correlation), the volatility of the portfolio will be higher. Higher volatility means higher risk. This is the case with the first economy.
In the second economy however, the stocks are independent of each other meaning there is zero correlation between stocks and hence the portfolio volatility will be much lesser.
As a risk-averse investor you will prefer the portfolio with lower volatility for the same expected return.
Answer:
Roland works as a researcher for his manufacturing firm. He has conducted primary research to collect relevant market research data that will help his firm. He decided to use mathematical and statistical tools to analyze the data because the data is in nature.
Roland is about to analyze primary market research data.
Explanation:
Primary data are always in a state of nature. Primary data are collected by Roland before analysis are from first-hand or primary sources. For Roland to acquire the data, he must use primary research methods like surveys, interviews, or experiments. Because primary data are acquired with the research project in mind and directly from primary sources, they are contrasted with secondary data. Secondary data were acquired by some other researchers and used in their analyses before being collected by another researcher as a basis for research continuation.
The government helped the economy by preventing monopolies that way small independent buissness could survive.
Answer:
Yes the statement is correct.
Explanation:
The statement is given by Matt Cheuvrant. In business the statement is absolutely correct that you can not satisfy the need of all the customers. A business cannot offer a product at less than its cost if a customer cannot afford it. Also an organization cannot start manufacturing a product because one customer demands it. If the company decides to satisfy all his customers by offering a large variety of products it may result in establishing in-house competition resulting in declining profits from both the products. If the company tries to give everything to every one this enhances its risk of failure resulting nothing in its own hands.
Businesses should focus on a single product and try to create a niche market. The product should be unique and its features should be extensively different from the other competitive products available in the market. This creates heavy switching cost to customers which ensures the business that customers will retain loyal to it. You can everything for few customers. They will not want to leave you because of your product specific features that are not available in the market.
