1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uysha [10]
2 years ago
6

11. During the debate over the Constitution and whether to add a Bill of Rights, what would’ve been the point of view of an anti

-federalist? *
The Constitution is good because it makes a stronger federal government; a Bill of Rights isn’t necessary.
The Constitution is good because it makes a stronger federal government; a Bill of Rights is necessary.
The Constitution is bad because it makes the federal government too strong; a Bill of Rights isn’t necessary.
The Constitution is bad because it makes the federal government too strong; a Bill of Rights is necessary.
Law
1 answer:
dmitriy555 [2]2 years ago
8 0
It would be the last choice.
Anti-Federalists feared a strong federal government and were worried about their rights therefore, they thought that a Bill of Rights was necessary.
You might be interested in
Is a gangster also a druggy
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

only the ones that want to get in to does things but not all gangster are druggys

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In trial for homicide, a conviction cannot be had the body of the victim has been found.
stellarik [79]

Answer:

If this is a true or false question then the answer is false

there are many ways a trial can still be had; here is one example...

Explanation:

A murder conviction without a body is an instance of a person being convicted of murder despite the absence of the victim's body. Circumstantial and forensic evidence are prominent in such convictions. ... In all cases, unless otherwise noted, the remains of the victims were never recovered.

hope this helps :)

may I get brainliest please?

3 0
3 years ago
Of the following, which is a universal requirement for a police officer applicant?
boyakko [2]
Valid drivers license
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the supreme court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut?
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.

Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide

3 0
3 years ago
A legal brief can be can be
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

a legal brief can be can be a formal written argument to a court

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sebutkan latar belakang dari mosi Sekolah daring masa pandemi ini mengurangi efektifitas belakar siswa!
    10·1 answer
  • The typical first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation is called:A. RemediationB. The adjudicationC. The a
    11·1 answer
  • Which option runs counter to the classical theory of criminology?
    15·1 answer
  • Criminal liability consists of three elements. What is the correct ordering of these elements for the purposes of determining li
    11·1 answer
  • If Law does not punish the criminal what should be the condition of this universe?
    10·1 answer
  • What is critical justices funnel? 3 sentences IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
    8·1 answer
  • 4. How is criminal law and civil law codified in Arizona?
    5·2 answers
  • Let's Check In The five general principles from the APA are meant to __________. A. be enforceable rules B. be posted in every o
    8·1 answer
  • Is it illegal to record a conversation without the other person knowing
    11·1 answer
  • This question is mde for scottrn9696 76+98+100+08^78(0908409)---0983710 E=mc^2
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!