1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uysha [10]
3 years ago
6

11. During the debate over the Constitution and whether to add a Bill of Rights, what would’ve been the point of view of an anti

-federalist? *
The Constitution is good because it makes a stronger federal government; a Bill of Rights isn’t necessary.
The Constitution is good because it makes a stronger federal government; a Bill of Rights is necessary.
The Constitution is bad because it makes the federal government too strong; a Bill of Rights isn’t necessary.
The Constitution is bad because it makes the federal government too strong; a Bill of Rights is necessary.
Law
1 answer:
dmitriy555 [2]3 years ago
8 0
It would be the last choice.
Anti-Federalists feared a strong federal government and were worried about their rights therefore, they thought that a Bill of Rights was necessary.
You might be interested in
The defense attorney acknowledges that Charles is guilty of this crime, but he does not believe that Charles is an evil person n
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

kil yourself e]xdguienjkvnljuibveh

7 0
3 years ago
Describe the differences between Civil and Criminal Court.
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

In a criminal court, a defendant is either acquitted or found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It is the responsibility of the state or federal government to prove that the defendant undoubtedly committed the crime. In a civil court, a plaintiff brings a lawsuit against a defendant

Criminal law deals with behavior that is or can be construed as an offense against the public, society, or the state—even if the immediate victim is an individual. Examples are murder, assault, theft,and drunken driving. Civil law deals with behavior that constitutes an injury to an individual or other private party, such as a corporation. Examples are defamation (including libel and slander), breach of contract, negligence resulting in injury or death, and property damage.

Explanation:

PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST

3 0
3 years ago
What might the consequences be if electors were allowed to vote differently than for the presidential candidate they were pledge
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

Electors are typically chosen and nominated by a political party or the party's presidential nominee: they are usually party members with a reputation for high loyalty to the party and its chosen candidate. Thus, a faithless elector runs the risk of party censure and political retaliation from their party, as well as potential legal penalties in some states. Candidates for electors are nominated by state political parties in the months prior to Election Day. In some states, such as Indiana, the electors are nominated in primaries, the same way other candidates are nominated. In other states, such as Oklahoma, Virginia, and North Carolina, electors are nominated in party conventions. In Pennsylvania, the campaign committee of each candidate names their candidates for elector (an attempt to discourage faithless electors). In some states, high-ranking and/or well-known state officials up to and including governors often serve as electors whenever possible (the Constitution prohibits federal officials from acting as electors, but does not restrict state officials from doing so). The parties have generally been successful in keeping their electors faithful, leaving out the rare cases in which a candidate died before the elector was able to cast a vote.

5 0
3 years ago
After the crime scene has been secured, what is the next step for an investigator?
erastova [34]
The answer is d sum it cooler
4 0
3 years ago
What does the Constitution reflect of the country’s founders?
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

d. their future planning

Explanation:

The government created by the constitution reflects the philosophies of the founding fathers because part of them created the model that permitted the elaboration of the constitution, while the other parts influenced it indirectly.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is NOT a statement of American national
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Bill of Rights impact the ratification of the Constitution?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following actions is illegal?
    11·2 answers
  • Help me please! i need to know each this for a quiz
    8·2 answers
  • What is one major disadvantage of executive orders?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the main role of a jury in a criminal trial?
    7·1 answer
  • Special Agent Morris joined the FBI two years ago. He works long, irregular hours. What is the most likely reason for this?
    14·1 answer
  • For Part 2 of this activity, you will be exploring the roles of citizens on the local, state, and federal level. Do you feel tha
    10·1 answer
  • Miguel has arrived at his job interview and is incredibly nervous. Give Miguel at least one suggestion on how he can appropriate
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is example of a personal distraction?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!