Answer:
An alternative to imprisonment that he would use to reduce overcrowding in prisons would be the use of alternative penalties in cases of minor offenses: thus, for example, for crimes with prison sentences of less than 3 years, he would use other measures such as fines, plans education, community work, etc., thus reducing the number of people held in prisons provided that they do not represent an imminent danger to society, nor that the crime committed deserves a greater penalty.
Answer:
The answer would be the Federal Court.
Explanation:
This is because the Federal Court covers the whole united states, and the State Court only covers a specific state.
I hope this helped!
They are similar because relationship amongst police can either affect some and harm others
Explanation:
<h3>The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle stated succinctly that "laws should govern". In simple terms, democracy focuses on how societies select those who will hold power, while the rule of law is concerned with how political power is exercised. </h3><h3>The aim of rule of law like other constitutional principles is the uplifting of freedom and fundamental rights of the people. The rule of law has propounded to make sure that the executive doesn't use law of the land or country to oppress or curtail freedom of individuals as they are found in the bill of rights.</h3>
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
