All categories

2 years ago

The question is in the photo. Please answer with the correct answer.

Mathematics

2 answers:

Leni [432]2 years ago

8 0

It should be 64 square meters

Taya2010 [7]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

64 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

A square has equal sides
So, the length and width of a square are the same
So, the length and width of this square is 8 meters long
Area = L × W
Area = 8 × 8
Area = 64 meters

I hope this helps!

You might be interested in

The sum of two numbers is 21.

Delvig [45]

Answer:

3 and 18

Step-by-step explanation:

let x be the first number

let 6x be the second number

x + 6x = 21

7x=21

x=21/7

x=3

second number =6x

second number 6x3= 21

5 0

3 years ago

What are two numbers that when multiplied equal -2, and also when added equals 1

lara [203]

Two numbers that multiply to -2 could be

-1 and 2

Or

-2 and 1.

Since -1+2=1, -1 and 2 are the numbers you are looking for.

Hope this helps!

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Solve the following 3 × 3 system. Enter the coordinates of the solution below.

defon

9514 1404 393

Answer:

(x, y, z) = (-1, 0, -3)

Step-by-step explanation:

We notice that the coefficients of z are such that elimination of the z term from the equations is made easy.

Adding equations 1 and 2:

(2x -3y -2z) +(x +3y +2z) = (4) +(-7)

3x = -3

x = -1

Adding equations 2 and 3:

(x +3y +2z) +(-4x -4y -2z) = (-7) +(10)

-3x -y = 3

Substituting for x, we get ...

(-3)(-1) -y = 3

0 = y . . . . . . . . . . . add y-3 to both sides

Then z can be found from any equation. Substituting for x and y in the second equation gives ...

-1 +2z = -7

2z = -6 . . . . . add 1

z = -3 . . . . . .divide by 2

The solution is (x, y, z) = (-1, 0, -3).

3 0

3 years ago

A group of researchers wants to know whether men are more likely than women to contract a novel coronavirus. They surveyed two r

olasank [31]

Answer:

Test statistic Z= 0.13008 < 1.96 at 0.10 level of significance

null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>Step(I)</em>:-

Given surveyed two random samples of 390 men and 360 women who were tested

first sample proportion

$p_{1} = \frac{360}{390} = 0.9230$

second sample proportion

$p_{2} = \frac{47}{52} = 0.9038$

Step(ii):-

Null hypothesis : H₀ : There is no difference proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

Alternative Hypothesis:-

There is difference between proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

$Z = \frac{p_{1}- p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } } }$

where

$P = \frac{n_{1}p_{1} +n_{2} p_{2} }{n_{1}+n_{2} }$

P = 0.920

$Z= \frac{0.9230-0.9038}{\sqrt{0.920 X0.08(\frac{1}{390}+\frac{1}{52} } )}$

Test statistic Z = 0.13008

Level of significance = 0.10

The critical value Z₀.₁₀ = 1.645

Test statistic Z=0.13008 < 1.645 at 0.1 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

7 0

3 years ago

The number of dogs at the animal shelter is 150 less than the number of

Hoochie [10]

Answer:

48, hope this helps!

6 0

2 years ago