<span>unconditioned stimulus.
im not sure though </span>
Answer:
the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is $5,632.73
Explanation:
The computation of the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is as follows:
= $1,075 × (1.08^3) + $1,210 × (1.08^2) + $1,340 × (1.08^1) + $1,420 ×(1.08^0)
= $1,354.19 + $1,411.34 + $1,447.20 + $1,420
= $5,632.73
Hence, the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is $5,632.73
The same is to be considered and relevant
Answer:
<u><em></em></u>
- <u><em>Law of demand</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Indeed, the <em>law of demand </em>is that the price and quantity demanded are inversely related. <em>Ceteris paribus</em>, the economist say. It is a latin expression that means "<em>other things equal</em>".
As the resources are, per definition, scarce, the consumers, ecomomic agents who buy the products, need to allocate the money among the different goods and services that the market puts at their disposal.
And they allocate the resources in a intelligent way: they "calculate" the utility of each product considering the cost. If the price increase, the ratio of utility to cost decreases and the consumer will diminish the quantity demanded for that good. If the price decrases, the utility to cost ratio increases and the quantity demanded will increase.
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
Answer:
Revenue: The revenue of Manufacturing company comes from the sale of the products that they manufacture. However the merchandising company purchases goods from manufacturing companies and distribute them to make it easier for the customer to access the product and earn a profit on it which increases the cost of the product to end consumer. The contract between the manufacturing and merchandising company can be an agreement of principal and agent. In this case, the revenue for the merchandising company would be commission earned from manufacturing company. This commission paid to merchandising company will be cost to manufacturing company.
Cost of Sale: Now the raw material costs plus depreciation of production machinery plus direct labour plus variable Overhead cost plus if their is any commission paid for sale of finished goods will be the cost of sale for manufacturing company. Whereas in the case of Merchandising company, the cost of sale will be only the cost of goods they sold in the year. The depreciation charge will be minor in merchandising company as they don't have any production machineries.
These the are major difference between manufacturing and merchandising company.
Explanation:
