Answer:
El materialismo es la posición de que todo es físico, por lo que la mente también debe ser física. No hay alma o fantasma en la máquina con la que no podamos interactuar u observar; el cerebro y el cuerpo es todo lo que tenemos.
El funcionalismo es la posición de que los estados mentales deben definirse no por cómo se implementan, sino por su función dentro del sistema en el que se encuentran. Entonces, el dolor puede ser el estado que está presente durante una lesión corporal, hace que un agente retroceda ante los estímulos lesivos, hace que el agente desee evitar esos estímulos en el futuro, etc., etc. Para el funcionalista, no importa si este estado se implementa dentro de neuronas o silicio. De cualquier manera, es doloroso.
Con respecto a la relación entre materialismo y funcionalismo, muchos funcionalistas son materialistas (o fisicalistas), pero no hay nada inherente al funcionalismo que obligue a sus seguidores a ser materialistas.
Answer:
Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.
Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.
The advice that should be provided to the bank manager about the pitfalls of accepting security from Wisteria's parents, including the necessary precautions the bank should take, include:
- The bank should ensure that it provides adequate explanations to Wisteria's parents about the nature of the overdraft and the financial state of Acme Pty Ltd.
- The bank should further explain the limitations of the guarantee involved with respect to the mortgage of the home.
- The bank should discover if Wisteria's parents' home is under another mortgage.
- The bank should take precautions that it does not fall into the pits that the classical case of Commercial Bank of Australia v. Amadio by not indulging itself in unconscionable conduct with the parents of Wisteria.
<h3>What is unconscionable conduct?</h3>
Unconscionable conduct is harsh conduct that goes against good conscience.
Unconscionable conduct is usually described as oppressive without considering its unfairness.
Thus, in seeking Wisteria's parents to mortgage their home to the bank, the bank manager should be careful not to mingle its business dealings with persons who lack the capacity to enter into a valid guarantee for Acme Pty Ltd.
Learn more about unconscionable conduct at brainly.com/question/13720902
This is true but don’t quote me on that
I personally have a more utilitarian outlook on morality. Not only making decisions that maximize pleasure for yourself but for others as well. Religion can be very helpful in forming a set of personal morals, however, it is not absolutely necessary. I would rather please the people around me than to follow the classic Divine Command Theory. Because my choices may not have such a positive impact on everyone or myself
