Answer:
a) (USD/CAD) on July 15, 2016 was 1.2937
b) six-month forward rate of (USD/CAD)= 0.0165
c) hree-month forward exchange rate of (JPY/USD) on July 15, 2016 is 0.0105263
Explanation:
a) Please see the exchange rate on this link: https://www.poundsterlinglive.com/bank-of-england-spot/historical-spot-exchange-rates/usd/USD-to-CAD-2016
b) Now it's too far to check forward rate in 2016, so we have to calculate ourselves
6 month forward rate = exchange rate on 15 Jan 2017/ exchange rate on 15 July 2016 -1 = 1.3151/1.2937 -1 = 1.65% semi annual or 3.3%pa
c) please see link https://www.currency-converter.org.uk/currency-rates/historical/table/JPY-USD.html
15/07/2016 1 JPY = 0.0095 USD
15/10/2016 1 JPY = 0.0096 USD
3 month forwar rate = 0.0096/0.0095-1 = 0.0105263
It is true to say that the ARIBA network may not function as B2C as opposed to B2B, as ARIBA is a business network focused on Business to Business (B2B) where buyers and suppliers can collaborate.
The advantages of companies participating in the ARIBA network are:
Therefore, buyers have the advantages of greater management of the acquisition process and control of expenses, building an effective supply chain.
And suppliers increase cash flow, simplify the sales process and increase customer satisfaction.
Learn more about B2B here:
brainly.com/question/24674966
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The most relevant one because university is the place to produce expert in many fields. Thus this will increase your earnings within your course of career.
Answer:
The answer is option e. $44.46
Explanation:
The stock's expected price after 5 years can be expressed as;
FV=CV(1+RRR)^n
where;
FV=future value of stock/expected price after 5 years
CV=current price of stock
DGR=dividend growth rate
n=number of years
In our case;
FV=unknown
CV=$35.25 per share
DGW=4.75%=4.75/100=0.0475
n=5 years
replacing;
FV=35.25(1+0.0475)^5
FV=35.25(1.0475)^5
FV=44.46
Answer:
Consultation.
Explanation:
In the scenario observed in the question, it can be seen that the dean used the consultation tactic.
This tactic can be defined as the influencing leader seeking support from others to influence a group. This is an effective approach to increase group satisfaction due to the value of democratic decision-making.
The benefits of this technique are described in the question, such as the increased commitment of the faculty, who are now interested in seeing the process succeed and the objective of accreditation fulfilled.