Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Because if you get 1 per day there is 24 hours meaning there is going to be 17,280 in 30 days so you end up making more in 30 days by getting 1,000,000
Answer:
Option B) Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 333
p = 48% = 0.48
Alpha, α = 0.01
Number of women belonging to union , x = 149
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a two-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.273079
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that proportion of homes in Oregon that were heated by natural gas is different from what was reported.
B. Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Answer:
Mrs. Buggie should have Subtracted 13 instead of adding 13
LKA = 94°
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets work backwards from the equation so far:
40 = x+ 13
x + 13 = 40
We should subtract 13 because we are adding a number and 13 to 40
Imagine this:
You have 5 apples, but you bought some more and now you have 10
equation would be:
5+x = 10
subtract 5 from 10 to get 5
So you bought 5 apples
Back to the Question:
40 - 13 = 27
3(27) + 13 = 81+13 = 94°
Answer = 94°
If my answer is incorrect, pls correct me!
If you like my answer and explanation, mark me as brainliest!
-Chetan K
its some t.v show I guess
30 out of 140
that means the equation is 30/140
that equals .2142 . . .
that moves over the 21%
