1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bogdanovich [222]
3 years ago
12

50 points help please

Physics
1 answer:
blsea [12.9K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C?

Explanation:

Yep,It's C all right.

You might be interested in
Which atomic model proposed that electrons move in specific orbits around the nucleus of an atom
BabaBlast [244]
Bohr's atomic model
8 0
3 years ago
How does a bicycles kinetic energy change when it slows down?
-Dominant- [34]
The kinetic energy decreases 
7 0
4 years ago
Consider a container of oxygen gas at a temperature of 23°C that is 1.00 m tall. Compare the gravitational potential energy of a
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

Yes, it is reasonable to neglect it.

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, a single molecule of oxygen weights 32 g (diatomic oxygen) thus, the mass of kilograms is (consider Avogadro's number):

m=1molec*\frac{1mol}{6.022x10^{23}molec} *\frac{32g}{1mol}*\frac{1kg}{1000g}=5.31x10^{-26}kg

After that, we compute the potential energy 1.00 m above the reference point:

U=mhg=5.31x10^{-26}kg*1.00m*9.8\frac{m}{s^2}=5.2x10^{-25}J

Then, we compute the average kinetic energy at the specified temperature:

K=\frac{3}{2}\frac{R}{Na}T

Whereas N_A stands for the Avogadro's number for which we have:

K=\frac{3}{2} \frac{8.314\frac{J}{mol*K}}{6.022x10^{23}/mol}*(23+273)K\\ \\K=6.13x10^{-21}J

In such a way, since the average kinetic energy energy is about 12000 times higher than the potential energy, it turns out reasonable to neglect the potential energy.

Regards.

8 0
4 years ago
Suppose you design a new thermometer called the "x" thermometer. on the x scale, the boiling point of water is 130.0 ox and the
Hoochie [10]

You've told us:

-- 130°x  =  212°F

and

-- 10°x  =  32°F

Thank you.  Those are two points on a graph of °x vs °F .  With those, we can figure out the equation of the graph, and easily convert ANY temperature on one scale to the equivalent temperature on the other scale.

-- If our graph is going to have °x on the horizontal axis and °F on the vertical axis, then the two points we know are  (130, 212)  and  (10, 32) .

-- The slope of the line through these two points is

Slope = (32 - 212) / (10 - 130)

Slope = (-180) / (-120)

Slope = 1.5

So far, the equation of the graph is

F = 1.5 x + (F-intercept)

Plug one of the points into this equation.  I'll use the second point  (10, 32) just because the numbers are smaller:

32 = 1.5 (10) + F-intercept

32 = 15 + (F-intercept)

F-intercept = 17

So the equation of the conversion graph is

F = 1.5 x + 17

There you are !  Now you can plug ANY x temperature in there, and the F temperature jumps out at you.

The question is asking what temperature is the same on both scales. This seems tricky, but it's not too bad.  Whatever that temperature is, since it's the same on both scales, you can take the conversion equation, and write the same variable in BOTH places.

We can write [ x = 1.5x + 17 ], solve it for  x, and the solution will be the same temperature in  F  too.

or

We can write [ F = 1.5F + 17 ], solve it for  F, and the solution will be the same temperature in  x  too.

F = 1.5F + 17

Subtract  F  from each side:  0.5F + 17 = 0

Subtract 17 from each side:   0.5F = -17

Multiply each side by 2 :  F = -34

That should be the temperature that's the same number on both scales.

Let's check it out, using our handy-dandy conversion formula (the equation of our graph):

F = 1.5x + 17

Plug in -34 for  x:  

F = 1.5(-34) + 17

F = -51 + 17

<em>F = -34</em>

It works !  -34 on either scale converts to -34 on the other one too. If the temperature ever gets down to -34, and you take both thermometers outside, they'll both read the same number.

<em>yay !</em>

6 0
3 years ago
A parallel-plate capacitor made of circular plates of radius 75 cm separated by 0.15 cm is charged to a potential difference of
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

See the attached pictures for detailed steps.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In order to increase the amount of work completed, it is necessary to decrease the force applied to an object. decrease the time
    7·2 answers
  • Each of the space shuttle's main engines is fed liquid hydrogen bya high-pressure pump. Turbine blades inside the pump rotateat
    8·1 answer
  • One event in a high school track meet is the 400 meter run. If the runners of the 4oo meter event start and end at the same loca
    12·1 answer
  • A lightweight string is wrapped several times around the rim of a small hoop. If the free end of the string is held in place and
    5·1 answer
  • 1 Point
    9·1 answer
  • A ball is thrown vertically upward with a speed of 19.0 m/s. (a) How high does it rise? m (b) How long does it take to reach its
    13·2 answers
  • You put a 3 kg block in the box, so the total mass is now 9 kg, and you launch this heavier box with an initial speed of 5 m/s.
    14·1 answer
  • Is that possible to separate the water particles from the air
    14·2 answers
  • The temperature of a substance during an experiment can be modeled by the function f(x)=−7.5cos(πx30)+31.4 , where f(x) is the t
    7·2 answers
  • Find the magnitude of the sum of two vectors; A is 5 km , and B is 7 , when the angle btween them is 120
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!