When applying indirect proofs, we assume the negation of the conclusion is true, and show that this assumption would lead to nonsense, or contradiction.
In our case we assume a is not smaller than 7, that is we assume a≥7.
a≥7 then, multiplying both sides by 3:
3a≥21, then, adding both sides 7:
3a+7≥28,
which is a contradiction because 3a+7 is smaller than 28.
So our assumption is wrong, which means the opposite of it is correct.
Answer: assume a≥7
For this case we find the slopes of each of the lines:
The g line passes through the following points:

So, the slope is:

Line h passes through the following points:

So, the slope is:

By definition, if two lines are parallel then their slopes are equal. If the lines are perpendicular then the product of their slopes is -1.
It is observed that lines g and h are not parallel. We verify if they are perpendicular:

Thus, the lines are perpendicular.
Answer:
The lines are perpendicular.
Answer:
(x+1)(2x-3)(3x-5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
non of these choices I guess
Answer:
on what's app ?
Step-by-step explanation:
or telegram ?