Answer: A firm operating across borders must deal with both foreign and international environment. Options A and B
Explanation:
International Business is a kind of business between two or more countries, that involves the trade of products and services across national borders or on a global level.
An example is the oil industry in which oil is produced by one country and sold to another. Both countries deal with both Foreign and International environments.
Market structure is determined by the number and relative size of the firms in an industry.
- Market structure describes how different industries are categorized and distinguished based on how fiercely and in what ways they compete with one another for customers' goods and services. There are four different kinds of market structures: monopolistic competition, oligopolistic markets, perfect competition, and monopolistic markets.
- In economics, market structure illustrates how businesses are categorized and distinguished according to the sorts of items they sell and how external circumstances and elements impact their operations. It is simpler to comprehend the peculiarities of various marketplaces when there is a clear market structure.
- The four types of economic market structures are oligopoly, monopoly, perfect competition, and monopolistic competition. The following characteristics explain why the categories are different: In oligopoly, there are few producers, many in perfect and monopolistic competition, and one in monopoly.
Thus the correct answer is Option D.
To learn more about market structure, refer: brainly.com/question/27874368
#SPJ4
D) They pay for specific social programs rather than general government activities.
Answer:
Explanation:
Calculation of total loss:
Net loss 320,000
Preferred dividend [5000*8%*100] 40,000
Total loss 360,000
Calculation of shares:
Common shares 250,000
Additional common stock [36,000*7/12] 21,000
Total shares 271,000
Loss per share = 360,000/271,000 = $1.328
Answer:
Morally, how about we start with business morals. Extensively business morals spin around progressively the estimation of the business to investors or partners (contingent upon the type of private enterprise). In the event that redistributing work diminishes costs and converts into expanded benefits for the organization, that is sufficient to consider it in accordance with the all-encompassing order of the business whether or not there is a decrease in cost for the buyer.
Is it morally wrong to use innovative advances to build creation productivity when request in a market is generally inelastic? Cultivating used to be 40% of American employments. Presently it's generally 2% but then out creation has developed.
Long haul the pulverization of a class of business is regularly counterbalanced by the formation of another classification the requires increasingly psychological assets. Actually, whole new enterprises can be made. So it is additionally not so much exact to restrict your view to simply the individuals who are dislodged from their occupations. It is completely conceivable that the net impact on the economy is sure.
Be that as it may, again morals are increasingly emotional and have to do with the type of private enterprise to which one buys in, political way of thinking, and perspective on social duty of business.