Answer:
59 orders
Explanation:
For computing the how many rolls should order at a time, first we have to determine the economic order quantity which is shown below:
The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
=
where,
Carrying cost = $875 × 20% = $175
And, other items values would remain the same
ow put these values to the above formula
So, the value would be equal to
=
= 50.71 units
Now The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
= $3,000 ÷ 50.71 units
= 59 orders
Answer:
a. yes no
Explanation:
At the time of contract the service revenue is not been realized because service is been perform and dealer made a promise to perform services in future. So the revenue will be deferred and will be earned or realized when service will be performed in the future. Deferred revenue will be effected and service revenue will not be effected at the time of contract.
<span>Hello,
</span>
Subsidy means allowance, funding, or donation.
Apart from the definition, I believe your answer would be:
<span>It keeps the price of domestic goods relatively low,
</span>
Answer:
(A) is the manner in which the burden of a tax is shared among participants in a market
Explanation:
Tax incidence refers to the burden of a tax between buyers or sellers or other stakeholders.
When price elasticity of supply is greater than price elasticity of demand, i.e a change in price causes supply to change more than demand, the tax incidence is said to be more burdensome for the buyers and vice versa.
It represents the distribution of tax burden to various sections of a society such as producers, consumers, etc.
For example, if taxes and duties are raised on alcohol or cigarettes, the producers shall transfer such burden on the consumers by covering their margin and raising prices. Thus, in such a case, the tax incidence would be borne by the consumers.
Answer:
this case tells us about some sort of pressures that accounts feel when financial statements are needed urgently
Explanation:
1) As for using low estimates, this step was wrong on her part. she should have been upfront in her estimates. for the items that she could not estimate there should have been an indication that such items were still under review, instead of doing what she did to give the financial estimate a good look. Using guesses or deliberately using low estimates was a bad idea, GAAP would never condone that.
She should have met with the president and let him know that finalization of the financial statements would not possible within the time frame that he has given. She could have also explain that such delays are normal and she would have given estimates of when the draft internal copy would be made available to him. such steps she took could have resulted in serious consequences for the company
2) I would not inflate or deflate the figures on purpose to make financial statements look better. If it is time to present the draft and final year-end financial statements I will have to tell the truth on the numbers and estimations used and also the reasons for that. i would have explained the constraints that i was facing. if i was still being pressurized by the president, i would have no choice than to call it quits instead of going against the ethics of my profession, since there are both ethical and legal implications to not giving inaccurate financial statements.