Answer:
Koski Inc.
Quick Ratio:
Quick Ratio = (Current Assets - Inventory) divided by Current Liabilities
Quick Ratio = $(23,595 - 12,480) / $(17,160 -5,460)
Quick Ratio = 11,115 / 11,700 = 0.95
Explanation:
The quick ratio is a financial metric that shows the short-term liquidity position of a company. It measures the company's ability to settle its short-term obligations using its most liquid current assets. The most liquid assets are cash and near cash current assets.
Inventory is always removed in calculating the most liquid current assets. Inventory will take some time before it can be converted to cash or near cash, given the cash conversion cycle.
The quick ratio is also called the acid-test ratio. It is also considered as more conservative than the current ratio which measures the coverage of current liabilities by all current assets, including inventory.
In our workings, we eliminated inventory from current assets. We also eliminated notes payable which would be rolled over the next year.
<span>Darius has a “conventional” personality type, this is according to Holland’s Six personality types, which means that he likes to work with numbers and data. This kind of person can carry out the task in detail and can easily follow the instruction of a others. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
The first one get advice and information is can I contact you with any other questions that I may have? The second one build your professional network is in what’s ways is my resume lacking if I want to find a psotion as a mechanic and the last one is the first one
I THINK THESE ARE THE CORRECT ANSWERS BUT TRY TO LOOK IT UP FIRST
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
Fires create external costs because they spread from one building to another. If the government wants to reduce the external costs of fires, <span>should it encourage subsidies for sprinkler systems.
Adding sprinkler systems can reduce the amount of fires that happen and spread because as soon as the fire starts, the sprinklers can put it out. Though these are costly, which they range in price depending on the system type and amount they are able to weigh the pros and cons of the system.
</span>