Answer:
a. Firm M probably has a higher dividend payout ratio than Firm N.
Explanation:
The dividend payout ratio is commonly referred to a portion of the net income of the company which is paid to the various shareholders in dividends. Therefore, if we consider the statements made in the question, Firm M has a higher annual net income while the annual net income of Firm N is fluctuating, we can conclude that the dividend payout ratio of Firm M is more than that of Firm N.
Answer:
$1,952 (Positive NPV)
Explanation:
Year Annual CF ($) PV factor at 10.30% PV of Cash Flow ($)
1 17,000 0.90662 15,413
2 17,000 0.82196 13,973
3 17,000 0.74520 12,668
4 17,000 0.67561 11,485
5 17,000 0.61252 10,413
6 17,000 0.55532 9,441
7 17,000 0.50347 8,559
TOTAL 1.73554 81,952
Net Present Value (NPV) = Present value of annual cash flows - Initial Cost
Net Present Value (NPV) = $81,952 - $80,000
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1,952 (Positive NPV)
Answer:
$1829000.
Explanation:
Given: Cash sales, $540,000.
Credit sales, $1,440,000.
Sales returns and allowances, $99,000.
Sales discounts, $52,000
Now, computing net sales of Newark.
Net sales= 
Net sales= 
⇒ Net sales= 
∴ Net sales= 
Hence, Newark´s net sales is $1829000.
Answer:
Outside vendors specializing in all aspects of benefits administration would provide improved support to the firm's employees.
Explanation:
Shared services HR teams provide specialized support of day-to-day transactional HR activities to the company's employees by focusing on using centralized call centers and outsourcing arrangements with vendors (like benefits providers). By utilizing HR shared services, Whitman and the other managers can now devote more time to other HR matters while improving benefits enrollment and coverage by deferring those questions to benefits specialists.
Answer:
$9,700
Explanation:
The computation of the consumption is shown below;
= Durable goods + Services + Non-durable goods
= $3,000 + $6,000 + $700
= $9,700
We simply added the durable goods, services and the non-durable goods so that the consumption could be come
Hence, the consumption is $9,700
Therefore the same is to be considered
