Answer:
The question is incomplete. These are the claims of the Classical Theory of Criminology;
- The first basic claim made by the classical theory of crime causation is that human beings are fundamentally rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will and rational choice.
- The classical theory believes that crime is a result of pain and pleasure which are the two central determinants of human behavior.
- The classical theory of crime causation is that to deter law violators punishment must be meted accordingly to serve as an example to others who would also violate this law.
- The classical theory of crime causation also believes that it cannot be denied that the root principles of right and wrong are in the nature of things.
- Also according to the classical theory, crime is an immoral behavior degrades the relationship quality that exists between individuals and society.
Explanation:
The classical theory is a school of thought popular in 18th century Europe. It believes that criminals were rational and that the severity of legal punishment should be restricted to the degree necessary for deterrence.
There are five key principles to understanding the classical school of thought. They are; Rationality, Hedonism, punishment and human rights
A balance between individual rights and social control is possible through a set of democratic and participatory laws.
<h3>What are individual rights?</h3>
Individual rights is a term that refers to the freedoms and rights that an individual has from the moment he is born. Among these rights are the right to move freely, the right to think and express oneself freely, among others.
<h3>What is control and authority?</h3>
Control and authority are terms that refer to the control that the state has over individuals so that society is in harmony and the lives of citizens are not disturbed.
In accordance with the above, it can be inferred that it is possible that there is a balance between these two concepts. In fact, in most democratic states today, individual rights allow the control and legitimate authority of the state.
Learn more about individual rights in: brainly.com/question/619133
#SPJ1
Answer:
Since 40 years have passed since the Supreme Court granted women the legal right to an abortion in its landmark case Roe v. Wade, the issue is still roiled in controversy, as antiabortion groups and state legislatures attempt to chip away at a woman’s right to choose. Over the past two years, 135 new state-level abortion restrictions were enacted. Additionally, 20 states are allowing insurers or employers to deny women affordable contraception by refusing to comply with Obamacare’s birth-control mandate.
In spite of those hurdles, pro-choice advocates have not given up in their fight for reproductive justice. The passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, for example, was certainly a victory for those who want to make family-planning tools accessible to all women because it increased health insurance coverage for women while lowering their health costs. Thanks to the health care reform law, millions of more women of color have access to contraception starting in August 2012.
Yet, as the following facts show, there’s still work to be done to ensure that all women especially women of color can access their legal right to decide when and whether to be a parent. Below are the top 10 reasons why women of color have a particularly significant stake in the conversation on abortion and reproductive rights.
Hope this helps, have a nice day! :D
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Since sexism is beneficial for men the most rather than women, and they get the least amount of effects from it.
Well i would say it is labor, because they’re forcing a child to do something that they don’t want to do. like if they ask their child to help out. then that’s fine. but they’re forcing them to help, which isn’t right
just my opinion
