Well the first part of the table is 7 cause 7x5- 35 x 6 is 42 x 7 49. Second part of the table is 8 x 5 40 x6 is 48 x 7 is 56. once you know this it is easy just to common factor it or just simply add 5 6 or 7 to the numbers already given
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
The slope is the rate
words per minute
we can do
540 words in 3 minutes
divide by 3
180 words in 1 minute
thea=180wpm
elanor=225wpm
elanor>thea
and 225*2=450
answers are
Thea reads 180 words per minute.
Eleanor reads 450 words every 2 minutes.
After 1 hour of reading, Eleanor reads more words than Thea.
Answer: 1775
Step-by-step explanation: a p e x
Answer:
Option (1)
Step-by-step explanation:
Two functions 'f' and 'g' have been graphed in the picture attached.
Both the functions will be equal at the points where the values of these functions are equal.
Those points are the point of intersection of both the functions on the given graph.
At x = -4,
f(-4) = g(-4) = 4
At x = 0,
f(0) = g(0) = 4
Therefore, Option (1) will be the answer.
