<h3><u>Reasons compared with current arguments for stronger immigration control:</u></h3>
Immigrants are said to threaten national security in most countries as terrorism has been on the rise and most foreign nationals found guilty of various crimes. This has caused strict immigration policies to be put in place as some countries in Europe resort to the prohibition of immigration and detention.
Most European countries have detention camps for asylum seeker and immigrants which has been deemed to be against human rights according to the United Nation. The treatment for those who are detained while awaiting proceedings isn’t that different from people detained in criminal justice.
Answer:
1. Something that is commanding, or a driving force: Compelling
2. Making a request of God for another
: Intercessory
3. Without regard to something else
: Irrespective
4. Knowing everything; having complete or infinite knowledge
: Omniscient
5. Absorbed in thought
: Preoccupied
6. Very great injustice; wickedness
: Iniquity
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
this is from a gamers point of veiw
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The quote is "if the Treaty of Versailles war fair, the Second World War would not have occurred."
I can justify this statement? in the following way.
The victorious allies in World War I forced Germany to pay for war reparations. Yes, France and Great Britain did not really want a peace treaty. They wanted retribution and forced Germany to pay for all the destruction created during the war.
Germany was especially opposed to Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles because it held Germany (and Austria) responsible for the war and required reparations. Germany also was forced to disarm its military.
In the end, this also resulted in a substantial loss of territory for Germany. All of these decisions and actions created so much pain and resentment in Germany. They helped set the stage for European conflict that would eventually result in World War II.
<span>If a state law allows the use of medical marijuana but federal law prohibits it, the state law violates: The supremacy clause of the Constitution
The supremacy clause indicates that in an event where a Federal law and a state law contradict one another, the federal law must be held at a higher standard than the state law</span>
