Answer:
The work done by the gravel to stop the truck is 520.44 kJ
Explanation:
<u>Step 1</u>: Data given
Mass of the truck = 3047.8 kg
The ramp has an angle of 9.5 °
Velocity of the truck = 20.68 m/s
distance = 26.6 meters
<u>Step 2:</u> Calculate initial kinetic energy
sin 9.5° = 0.165
h = ℓ*sin 9.5° = 26.6*0.165= 4.39 m
Ek = 1/2m*Vo² = 1/2*3047.8*20.68² = 651714.7 Joule = 651.7 kJ = initial kinetic energy
<u>Step 3: </u>Calculate potential energy
Epot = U = m*g*h = 3047.8*9.81*4.39 = 131256.25 Joule = 131.26 kJ
<u>Step 4:</u> What work is done by the truck on the gravel?
Frictional energy Ef = 651.7 kJ - 131.26 kJ = 520.44 kJ
<span>Star a is more distant and is approximately 5 times as far away as star b
Parallax is the change in angle that one must do in order to observe the same object from different locations. The further away an object is, the smaller the parallax is. As the angles approach zero, the trig functions tend to be fairly linear. And 0.1 arc seconds and 0.02 arc seconds are close enough to zero for this to hold true.
Since the parallax for star a is smaller than the parallax for star b, it is the more distant star. And since 0.1 divided by 0.02 = 5, it is approximately 5 times further away than star b.</span>
Answer: Provided in the explanation
Explanation:
I have understood that I have been influenced by the 'affinity bias' for quite a while. It caused me to feel fascination and feel better and right about individuals who had comparable intrigue and thought designs. I sort of began to feel this is the one for me based on those likenesses yet later used to be miserable when I comprehended that those similitudes are not many and insufficient consistently. I have begun to beat this inclination by rehearsing self reflection. I have begun to think about what causes me to feel pulled in to somebody and on the off chance that I introspect that it's exclusively founded on likenesses, at that point I cause myself to get that and monitoring that helps in escaping the inclination.
I make an effort not to get into the snare of paradoxes in my own announcements yet I have been forced to bear deceptions during contentions. One deception which I have encountered most is the 'Foul play' error as there have been a great deal of occurrences when individuals began to tear down me and my family when they couldn't win on a contention regarding balanced and rationale.
Basic reasoning causes us in understanding our defects and those issues of our own which keeps us from taking better choices and furthermore forestalls us tackling issues in more successful manners. Through basic reasoning, one can reflect and recognize utilization of deceptions in the contentions and that will help him in deciphering the circumstance from an alternate perspective. He will assess the circumstance better and through appropriate induction, he will have the option to get over those issues in thinking and subsequently, have the option to take better and more powerful choices for taking care of an issue.
The most fascinating idea which I have learned is that of the utilization of reflection or explicitly self reflection to comprehend ourselves better and furthermore to display basic reasoning appropriately. Being said that, I am a still somewhat confused about the manners by which we can reflect appropriately at each circumstance in a successful manner. This disarray remains in light of the fact that most deceptions and predispositions are oblivious in nature while the basic considering aptitudes reflection is cognizant and I meander whether a cognizant ability will have the option to break down and distinguish each oblivious inclinations or whether a few guards will keep a few inclinations covered up.
I don't know how good you are at sketching ... I'm terrible.
But you can put the point across in a dramatic way if you
can sketch a bowling ball and a basketball ... you'll need
to clearly identify them with the markings you sketch on
each ball.
They're the same shape and nearly the same size, but
there's a huge difference in their densities.
