Answer:
Federalism
Explanation:
This dual system of government present in the United States is called <u>federalism</u>, which is a governance structure whereby the federal government and the state governments coexist through a shared power scheme. State laws may not conflict with federal laws, including the U.S. Constitution.
Federalism is a dual system of government in which power is divided between a central national government and other governmental units such as a regional government or state government.
Answer:
Social conventional reasoning
Explanation:
Social conventional reasoning is common among adults and adolescents. This kind of reasoning is based on judging the level of morality of a action by comparing with the expectations or views of the society. an individual's obedience to rules are not based on moral reasoning but based on what the society expects.
Fernando's reasoning is conventional because he focuses on the rules of the society to control his behavior.
Answer:
d. applied the Second Amendment to state governments.
Explanation:
The second amendment was applied by the Supreme Court holding that it was incorporated under the fourteenth amendment as regards the Due Process Clause or Privileges or Immunities Clause , and reversing the Seventh Circuit in this way. This decision by the Supreme Court in June 2010 cleared the uncertainty in the Chicago gun restrictions as well as in other states.
Answer:
yes the apple store is free to use in indonesia as well
Explanation:
Answer:
The right option which is the best option to be taken by the Congress is to impeach the Supreme Court judges for their opinions which is option 3.
Explanation:
Removing someone from the Court would require an investigation and formal charges by the House Judiciary Committee, a majority vote in the House, a trial in the Senate, and a two-thirds majority.
This approach would need extremely compelling grounds for removal in order to gain support from more than 20 Republicans. As a practical matter, the House would need new information such as abuse of office, financial improprieties, or further evidence of sexual assault or perjury to provide the basis for removal, while the search for material would itself be easily criticized as partisan. .
