<h2><u>Q</u><u>u</u><u>e</u><u>s</u><u>t</u><u>i</u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u>↓</u></h2>
Negative aspects of Change
<h2>
<u>A</u><u>n</u><u>s</u><u>w</u><u>e</u><u>r</u><u>↓</u></h2>
<h3>
Negative:</h3>
- Inequality, both domestic and international, because of insufficient protections against exploitation. I say this is well worth the price.
- For some countries the loss of domestic industry, which has benefited developing nations immensely (including mine), but I am of the opinion that the paramount interests that policies and resources of a nation should serve are that of its citizens.
- Environmental degradation
- Imperative need for stronger international authorities, like the UN, which will be difficult even on a theoretical level.
- Globalisation is established under a set of rules when many nations didn’t even exist yet, but under international law, are bound to its rules by default.
<u>H</u><u>o</u><u>p</u><u>e</u><u>f</u><u>u</u><u>l</u><u>l</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>H</u><u>e</u><u>l</u><u>p</u><u>:</u><u>)</u>
- <u>#</u><u>C</u><u>a</u><u>r</u><u>r</u><u>y</u><u>O</u><u>n</u><u>L</u><u>e</u><u>a</u><u>r</u><u>n</u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u>g</u>
The answer is fifty three (53)
Which Johnson are you preferably talking about?
Albert Einstein and Elon musk
Answer:
Some might think that rational standards of inquiry will not be enough to avoid bias if the evidence available to
