Answer:
b. -36/77
Step-by-step explanation:
As 0 < x <
/2 => tan x > 0
As 0< y <
/2 => tan y > 0
We have the formula:
As tan x = 1/(cotx) => ![tan^{2}x = \frac{1}{cot^{2}x} =\frac{1}{225/64} = \frac{64}{225}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=tan%5E%7B2%7Dx%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bcot%5E%7B2%7Dx%7D%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B225%2F64%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B64%7D%7B225%7D)
As tan x > 0 => tan x = 8/15
As tan y > 0 => tan y = 4/3
As tan (x-y)=
Answer:
A. Obtuse
Step-by-step explanation:
Well we can cross out C and D just by looking at the triangle because the triangle is not equal and there is no right angle.
Also it is not B an acute because not all the angles are acute.
Hence, the answer is A. Obtuse
Theoretical probability:
1 ... (16 and 2/3) %
2 ... (16 and 2/3) %
3 ... (16 and 2/3) %
4 ... (16 and 2/3) %
5 ... (16 and 2/3) %
6 ... (16 and 2/3) %
Experimental results:
1 ... 18
2 ... 16
3 ... 16
4 ... 17
5 ... 16
6 ... 17
The total number of rolls in the experiment was
(18 + 16 + 16 + 17 + 16 + 17) = 100
so the expected frequency for each outcome was 16-2/3 times,
and the SIMULATION probabilities were
1 ... 18%
2 ... 16%
3 ... 16%
4 ... 17%
5 ... 16%
6 ... 17%
To me, this looks fantastically close. The cube
could hardly be more fair than it actually is.
We can't tell from the graph whether the left point of each step is included, or the right point. If the left, this is a graph of
y = 7 + floor(x)
Answer:
Hope this helps, happy november <3
Step-by-step explanation: