Answer:
Its "Customers get a new piece of jewelry every three months.
Explanation:
The first option, never tells what the customer gets in return.
Sorry this answer is two weeks late. Happy Thanks Giving!
Answer:
each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss. This is an equal share for each policy and is due to them having the pro rata liability clause. This clause states that a policy is only liable for an equal percentage of the loss if the insurer has other policies from other companies. As in this case.
now suppose that the government immediately pursues an accommodative policy by increasing government purchases in response to the short run economic impact of the higher oil prices <u>The output will be $billion and the price level will increase.</u>
<h3>What is
accommodative policy?</h3>
When a central bank (like the Federal Reserve) tries to increase the general money supply to support the economy when growth is stalling, this is known as accommodating monetary policy, often known as loose credit or easy monetary policy (as measured by GDP). The goal of the policy is to allow the money supply to increase in step with both the demand for money and national revenue.
- The expansion of the money supply by central banks to stimulate the economy is known as accommodating monetary policy.
- The Federal funds rate has been decreased as part of monetary policies that are deemed accommodating.
- The goals of these policies are to lower the cost of borrowing money and boost consumer spending.
To learn more about accommodative policy from the given link:
brainly.com/question/14245561
#SPJ4
<h3><u /></h3>
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
He is not sincere.
This is the negative form of the sentence.
