22. The area of a triangle can be represented by the expression 14x^5 + 63x^2. If the base is 7x^2, write

Mathematics

1 answer:

kkurt [141]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

h = 4x ^ 3 + 18

Step-by-step explanation:

The first thing you should know for this case is that the area of a triangle is given by:

A = (1/2) * (b) * (h)

Where,

b: base.

h: height.

Clearing the height we have:

h = ((2) * (A)) / (b)

Substituting the values

h = ((2) * (14x ^ 5 + 63x ^ 2)) / (7x ^ 2)

Simplifying the expression:

h = ((2) * (2x ^ 3 + 9))

h = 4x ^ 3 + 18

answer

an expression to represent its height is

h = 4x ^ 3 + 18

You might be interested in

Suppose each of the following data sets is a simple random sample from some population. For each dataset, make a normal QQ plot.

adell [148]

Answer:

a) For this case the histogram is not too skewed and we can say that is approximately symmetrical so then we can conclude that this dataset is similar to a normal distribution

b) For this case the data is skewed to the left and we can't assume that we have the normality assumption.

c) This last case the histogram is not symmetrical and the data seems to be skewed.

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following data:

(a)data = c(7,13.2,8.1,8.2,6,9.5,9.4,8.7,9.8,10.9,8.4,7.4,8.4,10,9.7,8.6,12.4,10.7,11,9.4)

We can use the following R code to get the histogram

> x1<-c(7,13.2,8.1,8.2,6,9.5,9.4,8.7,9.8,10.9,8.4,7.4,8.4,10,9.7,8.6,12.4,10.7,11,9.4)

> hist(x1,main="Histogram a)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

For this case the histogram is not too skewed and we can say that is approximately symmetrical so then we can conclude that this dataset is similar to a normal distribution

(b)data = c(2.5,1.8,2.6,-1.9,1.6,2.6,1.4,0.9,1.2,2.3,-1.5,1.5,2.5,2.9,-0.1)

> x2<- c(2.5,1.8,2.6,-1.9,1.6,2.6,1.4,0.9,1.2,2.3,-1.5,1.5,2.5,2.9,-0.1)

> hist(x2,main="Histogram b)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

For this case the data is skewed to the left and we can't assume that we have the normality assumption.

(c)data = c(3.3,1.7,3.3,3.3,2.4,0.5,1.1,1.7,12,14.4,12.8,11.2,10.9,11.7,11.7,11.6)

> x3<-c(3.3,1.7,3.3,3.3,2.4,0.5,1.1,1.7,12,14.4,12.8,11.2,10.9,11.7,11.7,11.6)

> hist(x3,main="Histogram c)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

This last case the histogram is not symmetrical and the data seems to be skewed.