The differences are that Magna Carta<span> was made to set rules and give rights to the nobility, royalty, and other high-ranking officials of that time, and the </span>Constitution<span> was written to give rules and rights to all people.</span>
Exposed them to new lands to conquer as well as spread influence too. It allowed competing countries to appear superior if they conquered land in the land. Land=resources and power all equate to more economic oppurtunities
The correct answer should be persuasive
Argumentative essays are about presenting your belief on something, supporting a side, presenting the opinions and facts regarding the other side, and then presenting the arguments you have against those opinions and facts. The purpose of an argumentative essay is to persuade something about the topic that you've chosen, so it's best if you answer persuasive.
Answer: supposedly in an effort to get rich or acquire political power.
Explanation:
The term carpetbagger was used by opponents of Reconstruction—the period from 1865 to 1877 when the Southern states that seceded were reorganized as part of the Union—to describe Northerners who moved to the South after the war, supposedly in an effort to get rich or acquire political power.
your welcome...
In me view theese two suits to be correct:
b. Democratic elections wouldbe held in South Vietnam.
c. American POWs in North Vietnam would be freed.
