Step-by-step explanation:
It came from nowhere. It makes no sense to add up the balance numbers. To illustrate, let's use a different example:
![\left[\begin{array}{cc}Spend&Balance\\100&400\\100&300\\100&200\\100&100\\100&0\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7DSpend%26Balance%5C%5C100%26400%5C%5C100%26300%5C%5C100%26200%5C%5C100%26100%5C%5C100%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Adding up the money you spent, and you get $500. Add up the balances, and you get $1000. But why would you add the balances? The 300 in the second line is included in the 400 in the first line. You can't add them together. You'd be counting the 300 twice.
Answer:
Check below, please
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
1) In the Newton Method, we'll stop our approximations till the value gets repeated. Like this

2) Looking at the graph, let's pick -1.2 and 3.2 as our approximations since it is a quadratic function. Passing through theses points -1.2 and 3.2 there are tangent lines that can be traced, which are the starting point to get to the roots.
We can rewrite it as: 

As for

3) Rewriting and calculating its derivative. Remember to do it, in radians.


For the second root, let's try -1.5

For x=-3.9, last root.

5) In this case, let's make a little adjustment on the Newton formula to find critical numbers. Remember their relation with 1st and 2nd derivatives.



For -1.2

For x=0.4

and for x=-0.4

These roots (in bold) are the critical numbers
Answer:
Domain : ( -3 , 4.5 )
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is 63 cm bc 30 60 90 triangles have a rule where the short leg is x longer is x√3 and the hypotenuse is x2
you can see this if you imagine the triangle as equilateral then cutting it in half