Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
3x+3-x+3=12
3x-x=12-3-3
2x=6
x=6/2
x=3
Answer:
1 cup
Step-by-step explanation:
1/4= 6/24
1/3= 8/24 --------
1/6= 4/24 -------- 24/24 = 1
1/8= 3/24
1/8= 3/24
