Answer: Resistance to change
Explanation: In the given case the managers of Inseason inc. made the focus on short term goals rather than the long term. The manager in the given case did not took proper actions to continue the firm with large scale operations.
The managers was resisting the change due to the risk factor that it might not lead to benefit and the continuous success that the entity is making might stop.
Thus, the correct option is A.
Answer: C. a reasonable amount that does not affect her quality of life.
Explanation:
These are some of my personal benifits of strategic management process:
It allows organizations to be proactive rather than reactive. A strategic plan allows organizations to foresee their future and to prepare accordingly.
It sets up a sense of direction.
It increases operational efficiency.
It helps to increase market share and profitability.
It can make a business more durable.
I hope it helped you!
Answer: market development
Explanation: In simple words,market development refers to the strategy in which a firm tries to cover new market or increase its sales in the existing market through promotion or product development etc.
These strategies are usually used by the multinational corporations that are going to start their business in some new foreign country.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B.
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
