Answer:
Could you please check if you've written the question properly
This question doesn't provide enough information
<h2>
Please mark as brainliest for further answers :)</h2>
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
soory i need points
I believe it's A. <span>Eva would have been better off selecting the 20-year term policy.
Unde current circumtances, 10-year term policy wouldn't guarantee thesafety of the kids because even after the policy ends, Eva's kids still haven't entered the age where they could find their own income (they would be 12, 13, and 15).
If Eva decided to add another 10 year despite the extra charge, The kids will be covered until they enter the productive age.</span>
The answer is 799 ur welcome
21.2264 is 21.2 rounded to the nearest tenths; the place after the decimal is there tenths place so in the hundreths place, the number 2 is less than 5 therefore rounding it to 2.
