Answer:
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, ***"The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court's own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891It is a working rule devised by the Court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review, the theory being that if four Justices find that a legal question of general importance is raised, that is ample proof that the question has such importance. This is a fair enough rule of thumb on the assumption that four Justices find such importance on an individualized screening of the cases sought to be reviewed."***
Rhis modus operandi helps to streamline the quality and amount of appeal that is granted Certiorari by ensuring that only very important question is given consideration.
This would hence discard those questions, scenarios or appeals that does not win the vote of the four justices.
Hence it is a not so favorable procedure to the minority masses holding a claim that seems trivial in the surface.
But this procedure should remain.
And also, camera's should not be prohibited in the court room. This helps to test for objectivity.
A president can know their 2 year term is up when other politicians are considering to prepare their own campaigns for the next election cycle. It always occurs in the midst of their term, usually two years in.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Central route to persuasion
Central route to persuasion happens when an individual is convinced by the content of the message.
Answer:
Therefore, economic gain and religion were the two factors that most affected the dynamics of European and indigenous American relationships. The Spanish: ... Indigenous populations declined over the seventeenth century as epidemics brought by the Spanish killed large numbers of natives.
Explanation:
Answer:
low-context cultures; high-context cultures
Explanation:
Regarding conflict and culture, researchers have found that people in low-context cultures give greater importance to task or instrumental issues and also places greater emphasis on words spoken, while people in high-context cultures give greater importance to the expressive or emotional aspects of managing the conflict. The main aim of the latter group is to express their feeling in order to release tension and avoid any form of embarrassment.