8. A concert charges $10 for each adult ticket and $5 for each child ticket. Sunday, the park collected a total of $1,750

Rewrite the following arguments using letters to represent the terms, reduce the number of terms and put the arguments in to sta

Gwar [14]

Answer:

P2 affirms P1 and the conclusion is in the same direction.

P1--->P2--->C

This argument is valid.

Step-by-step explanation: using the syllogism rules.

Premises 1 (P1) = Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity,

Premises 2 (P2) = so some persons invulnerable to arrest and prosecution are foreign emissaries

Conclusion (C) = because no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.

From the argument:

P1 uses "some", that means it's not "all" foreign emissaries person that does not have diplomatic immunity. This means that some other foreign emissaries have diplomatic immunity

P2 uses "some", that means it's affirms to that part of P1 which states that some foreign emissaries have diplomatic immunity.

The conclusion is valid because the part of P2 which states that some foreign emissaries are vulnerable to arrest, which affirms with P1 which states that Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity. That means no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution. This conclusion literally means that if you don't have diplomatic immunity, you are vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.

Therefore;

P2 affirms P1 and the conclusion is in the same direction.

P1--->P2--->C

This argument is valid.

5 0

3 years ago

Marty and Ethan both wrote a function, but in different ways.

lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

Marty's function has larger slope as compared to Ethan's slope.

Step-by-step explanation:

Marty function:

y plus 3 equals StartFraction 1 Over 3 EndFraction left-parenthesis x plus 9 right-parenthesis.

Writing in mathematical form: $y+3=\frac{1}{3}(x+9)$

Marty has written expression in point-slope form: $y-y_1=m(x-x_1)$ where m is slope

So, comparing Marty's equation with general point-slope form equation we get slope $m=\frac{1}{3}\:or\: 0.3$

Now, Ethan has a table

x y

-4 9.2

-2 9.6

0 10

2 10.4

We can find slope using formula: $Slope=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$

Using any two points, we can find slope of Ethan's equation

$Slope=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}\\Slope=\frac{9.6-9.2}{-2-(-4)} \\Slope=\frac{0.4}{-2+4} \\Slope=\frac{0.4}{2} \\Slope=0.2$

So, we get Marty's slope = 0.3

Ethan's slope = 0.2

So, Marty's function has larger slope as 0.3 is greater than 0.2

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If you have 24 square pieces of wood, describe all the different ways you could make a rectangle by placing them side by side

Ronch [10]

You have 24 square pieces of wood. You could lay them out in the following fashion. First number is the number of rows. Second number is the number of columns. For example:

1,24 is 1 row by 24 columns. Here goes:

1,24

2,12

3,8

4,6

6,4

8,3

12,2

24,1

i believe that's all.

<span>It winds up being the number of ways you can multiply two integers to get 24. </span>

7 0