Which of the Following is an example of commutative property of addition.

Exercise 3 Iron Man is checking out a new suit that fires lasers more accurately. If he is aiming for a bullseye, his original s

Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer: (a). insufficient evidence.

(b). sufficient evidence

(c). insufficient evidence

Step-by-step explanation:

we will analyse this carefully to help us understand it better.

we have the standard deviation for the original suit = 2mm

standard deviation for new suit = 1.6mm

given n = 1.6

from the question we know that the suit with less standard deviation is better than the other suit

considering a null hypothesis;

H₀ : б ≥ 2, (here the new suit is not better than the original alternative hypothesis).

Also Hi : б < 2 (we have here that the new suit is better than the original )

using the Chi-Square distribution with n-1 degree of freedom to test the claim about the value of the standard deviation;

X² = (n-1) s²/ б² = (16-1)(1.6)² / (2)² = 9.6

taking the P value of X² (9.6) for 15 D O F from the P value table gives us

1-0.8441 = 0.1559

also ∝ = 0.05

where P-value > ∝ (0.05)

we can see from here that there is insufficient evidence to claim that new suit is better than that of the original suit, having failed to neglect H₀

(b). Given n = 100 and s = 1.6

then we have that X² = (n-1) s²/ б² = (100-1)(1.6)² / (2)² = 63.36

P-value of X² at 99 dif gives 0.0020

where ∝ = 0.05

since P value < ∝

rejecting the null hypothesis H₀,

we can safely say that there is sufficient claim that the new suit is better than the original at 95%.

(c). where we have that ∝ = 0.001

for part(b) P-values = 0.0020

given P-value > ∝ ;

we fail to neglect the null hypothesis.

From this we can say that the is insufficient evidence backing the claim thhat the new suit is better than the original suit at 99.99% confidence level.

cheers i hope this helps!!!!!

5 0

3 years ago

Bee + ant= 10, ant - bee = 8, ant × bee= ?

Alona [7]

The Correct Answer Is...

9.

Any Questions? Comment Below!

-AnonymousGiantsFan

7 0

3 years ago

Connecticut families were asked how much they spent weekly on groceries. Using the following data, construct and interpret a 95%

Amanda [17]

Answer:

The 95% confidence interval for the population mean amount spent on groceries by Connecticut families is ($73.20, $280.21).

Step-by-step explanation:

The data for the amount of money spent weekly on groceries is as follows:

S = {210, 23, 350, 112, 27, 175, 275, 50, 95, 450}

n = 10

Compute the sample mean and sample standard deviation:

$\bar x =\frac{1}{n}\cdot\sum X=\frac{ 1767 }{ 10 }= 176.7$

$s= \sqrt{ \frac{ \sum{\left(x_i - \overline{x}\right)^2 }}{n-1} } = \sqrt{ \frac{ 188448.1 }{ 10 - 1} } \approx 144.702$

It is assumed that the data come from a normal distribution.

Since the population standard deviation is not known, use a t confidence interval.

The critical value of t for 95% confidence level and degrees of freedom = n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9 is:

$t_{\alpha/2, (n-1)}=t_{0.05/2, (10-1)}=t_{0.025, 9}=2.262$

*Use a t-table.

Compute the 95% confidence interval for the population mean amount spent on groceries by Connecticut families as follows:

$CI=\bar x\pm t_{\alpha/2, (n-1)}\cdot\ \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$

$=176.7\pm 2.262\cdot\ \frac{144.702}{\sqrt{10}}\\\\=176.7\pm 103.5064\\\\=(73.1936, 280.2064)\\\\\approx (73.20, 280.21)$

Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the population mean amount spent on groceries by Connecticut families is ($73.20, $280.21).

7 0

3 years ago

(This is a word problem) You are making up your own mix of concrete to patch a set of stairs. In order to have the proper mix, y

Alina [70]

The is 42 because that the answer to the question

8 0

2 years ago

Estimate the product 8.91 × 34,871.081

aleksklad [387]

The way I would do it is by rounding 8.91 up to 9 and I would round 34,871.081 up to 35,000.
9*35,000=315,000

Hopefully I was able to help in some way.

3 0

3 years ago