The letter S in the alphabet does not have any lines of symmetry. Therefore, the answer to this question is: Zero (0). This is because letter S is not symmetrical when it is cut or divided into 2 parts.
There is not enough information to calculate this.
<span>Knowing the weight ratio of the fox to coyote as 3:8 in no way allows you to know the respective ratio of the wolf. To know the weight of the wolf would require knowing its ratio value, then the weights of all 3 is an easy calculation. </span>
<span>Example - 3:8:15 (f:c:w) is a plausible ratio based upon real-world weight averages for certain species/subspecies of the three. </span>
<span>- knowing the values of the 3 terms as 3:8:15 gives a total of 3+8+15 = 26 ratio values </span>
<span>- you then simply divide the total weight by this ratio value total; 120/26 = 4.62 </span>
<span>- so each ratio value is 4.62 units of weight*** </span>
<span>- now, simply calculate the weight of each canid by multiplying its ratio value by the unit of weight... </span>
<span>fox; 3 x 4.62 = 13.86 </span>
<span>coyote; 8 x 4.62 = 36.96 </span>
<span>wolf; 15 x 4.62 = 69.3 </span>
<span>Validate the ratios by adding the weights together (we should get 120) 13.86 + 36.96 + 69.3 = 120.12 </span>
<span>The total is slightly out because that 4.62 figure was a rounding up. </span>
<span>Now, the thing is, there is nothing given that allows us to know exactly what ratio value the wolf should be, I chose 15 myself because that is a real-world plausible value when compared to 3:8 for the other 2. Changing it to 16, say, means that there are now 27 ratio values total giving a ratio value of 120/27 = 4.44 obviously changing the weights of all 3.</span>
Answer:
what
Step-by-step explanation:
is that you want to use
Answer:
ΔLMN ≅ ΔLQP by (SAA)
Step-by-step explanation:
It is given that line (NM) is congruent to the line (PQ), meaning they have the same measure. This is signified by the small red line on each of these sides.
Moreover, it is also given that angle (MNL) is congruent to angle (QPL), this is shown by the red arc around these angles.
Finally one can figure out that angle (NLM) is congruent to angle (PLQ) by the vertical angles theorem. The verticle angles theorem states that when two lines intersect, the opposite angles are congruent.
Thus the two triangles are congruent by side-angle-angle postulate, abbreviated as (SAA).
