Answer:
The difference between the two is that Hazard insurance can cover you and or protect you against "structural damage caused by natural disasters".
Meanwhile Homeowners insurance is "a financial protection against theft"...
So, long story short,
Hazard insurance=protection from natural disasters (structural damage)
Hazard insurance=protection from natural disasters (structural damage)Homeowners insurance=protection against theft and damage to your home and belongings
I hope this helped!!
Marx would maintain that Sally has experienced <u>false class consciousness</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
False class consciousness is the term used to describe the behavior of the employees who identify themselves as investors by mistake when they own few shares of stock or work as managers in large corporations. This term false class consciousness was used by famous sociologist Karl Marx.
In the above scenario, Sally was working for Ellis Corporation as a computer programmer. But she thinks herself as a stockholder as she holds few shares of Ellis stock and had $15,000 in her savings account.
Answer:
Credit the following;
Investment (Available for sale) $18,000
Gain on sale of an investment $2,000
Explanation:
Assuming all the unrealized holding gains and losses have been reversed, the investment will be recorded at the original cost of $18,000 instead of the fair value and the gain would then be $2,000.
The Journal entry for the sale would be;
DR Cash.......................................... .............$20,000
CR Investment (Available for sale)......................... $18,000
Gain on sale of an investment .................................$2,000
<em>(To record sale of bond investment)</em>
In this case it is a realistic view of the work. The manager makes it clear what the company intends with the employee. She explains that employment can offer good chances for professional growth, but also makes it clear that this will happen due to employee performance and consistent work. It is a realistic view of the job by presenting the benefits and duties of the employee.
Answer:
a. "Not deductible"
b. "Not deductible"
c. "Not deductible"
d. "Deductible"
e. "Not deductible"
f. "Not deductible"
Explanation:
Expenses to be deductible ( especially for tax purposes) must pass the WREN test where;
W stands for wholly
R stands for reasonably
E stands for exclusively
N stands for necessarily
Looking at the expenses incurred and paid for by Doug during the year, the $50 ticket for running a red light is not a necessary expense as an adherence to traffic signs would have prevented such an expense. it can also be said that the expense was not reasonably incurred. This also applies to options b and c. Parking at the handicapped space is completely avoidable (necessity test) and as such the $100 would not have been incurred. While the $200 paid to the attorney for representation in court is an offshoot of options a and b. This would not have been incurred if the first two incidences were avoided.
Option c is deductible as the $500 paid is wholly for the business, reasonable, exclusive and necessary. As such, the expense is deductible or allowable. Options e and f are not related to business and are incurred on personal grounds which are avoidable hence, these expenses would not pass the WREN test.
