Each element is 2/3 times the previous one, so that's a geometric sequence.
6×(2/3)=4, 4×(2/3)=8/3, 8/3×(2/3)=16/9, 16/9×(2/3)=32/27
Answer: 6, 4, 8/3, 16/9, 32/27
Answer:
A & F
Step-by-step explanation:
621 divided by 92 is 6.75
those two are the only people that have 6.75 or more
Answer:
$7.15
Step-by-step explanation:
The best way to solve this is by crossing out the data you don't need so you're left looking at the key pieces to put the equation together. If his dad paid him $45.76 for 6.4 hours, then all you need to do is divide 45.76 by 6.4. (Hint: Use a calculator, it makes it ten times faster than trying to write it out!)
45.76 ÷ 6.4 = 7.15
So Greg made $7.15 an hour working with his dad.
Answer:
- zeros: x = -3, -1, +2.
- end behavior: as x approaches -∞, f(x) approaches -∞.
Step-by-step explanation:
I like to use a graphing calculator for finding the zeros of higher order polynomials. The attachment shows them to be at x = -3, -1, +2.
__
The zeros can also be found by trial and error, trying the choices offered by the rational root theorem: ±1, ±2, ±3, ±6. It is easiest to try ±1. Doing so shows that -1 is a root, and the residual quadratic is ...
x² +x -6
which factors as (x -2)(x +3), so telling you the remaining roots are -3 and +2.
___
For any odd-degree polynomial with a positive leading coefficient, the sign of the function will match the sign of x when the magnitude of x gets large. Thus as x approaches negative infinity, so does f(x).