Its c hope that helps text me back if you want to know why it is.
<span>
<span>
</span><span><span>
Employee
<span> Dante </span>
<span> Elvira </span>
<span> Josie </span>
<span> Victor </span>
</span>
<span>
Gross Income
<span> 52,988.00 </span>
<span> 43,829.00 </span>
<span> 49,789.00 </span>
<span> 46,912.00
</span>
</span>
<span>
Std. deduction
<span> 8,350.00 </span>
<span> 5,700.00 </span>
<span> 8,350.00 </span>
<span> 5,700.00
</span>
</span>
<span>
<span># of exemption </span>
<span> 3 </span><span> 1 </span><span> 2 </span><span> 2
</span>
</span>
<span>
total exemption
<span> 10,950.00 </span>
<span> 3,650.00 </span>
<span> 7,300.00 </span>
<span> 7,300.00
(# of exemption * 3,650)
</span>
</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>
taxable income
<span> 33,688.00 </span>
<span> 34,479.00 </span>
<span> 34,139.00 </span>
<span> 33,912.00
(Gross Income - Std. deduction - total exemption)
Among the workers, DANTE has the lowest taxable income last year. </span></span></span></span>
3x + 11y = 4
2x + 6y = 0
I got
15/2, -5/4
1,250 because there’s 25 boxes and each have 50 so you multiple 50x25 to find out how much cards are in each box
Answer:
Table 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the tables:
<u>Table 1:</u>
x: 1 2 3 4
y: 2 4 6 8
<u>Table 2:</u>
x: 1 2 3 4
y: 2 4 8 16
<u>Table 3:</u>
x: 1 2 3 4
y: 2 4 7 11
<u>Table 4:</u>
x: 1 2 3 4
y: 2 4 6 10
An exponential growth data set will show a common ratio between y values. Let's look at each of the ratios from each table.
<u>Table 1:</u>
8/6 = 4/3
6/4 = 3/2
Already, we can see that 4/3 ≠ 3/2, which means that this doesn't have a common ratio. So Table 1 is wrong.
<u>Table 2:</u>
16/8 = 2
8/4 = 2
4/2 = 2
The common ratio here is 2, so we know this is correct.
<u>Table 3:</u>
11/7 = 1.57
7/4 = 1.75
Again, we can see that 1/57 ≠ 1.75, so this is wrong.
<u>Table 4:</u>
10/6 = 1.67
6/4 = 1.5
Again, there is no common ratio here, so this is wrong.
The answer is thus Table 2.
