1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
coldgirl [10]
3 years ago
8

"Anyone who was a British subject in South Africa and wh was not a European". Do you think this is a good definition for 'colour

ed'? Give reasons for yoir answer.
History
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I think that this definition can be improved to something like this.

In British South Africa times, coloured people could be considered the people born from one English father/mother, and the other from a black native South African. So these people were British subjects who had missed ancestry in their blood. Half of them were African and the other half was from Europe. This is a better definition.

In times of the British presence in South Africa, the term "coloured" was seen as a social category instead of being understood as a legal term. Most of these coloured people used to live in Cape Town, and were considered educated Christians.

You might be interested in
What is one major accomplishment of the neutralists
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

They made up the remaining one third of American colonists during the revolution.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 4 of 20
olga2289 [7]

Answer:D

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What does taft's view of filipinos reveal about american foreign policy?
wariber [46]
Taft's view of the Philippines shows that even though he loved the majority of the country, he was not willing to put American foreign policy in jeopardy<span> over losing an island in Asia.
Indicating that at that time, United States were more interested in making Philliphine as our trading foothold in Asia rather than making proper alliance to the country</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What was the relationship between the government, Native Americans, and American citizens?
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

Simple. The Native Americans were disliked. Americans took their land, hunted their buffalo, and forced them off their own land and set them to the Great Plains. The Natives were forced to abandon their culture and instead americans put in their culture. All the Natives wanted was peace. Americans passed the indian Removal Act.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Were citizens able to participate in the government America revolution
bazaltina [42]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

The Americans revolted because they were not represented in the British Parliament and could not make descisions for themselves.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How old would einstein be right now
    9·1 answer
  • How were the eucharistic signs of bread and wine prefigured in the old testament?
    10·1 answer
  • Why Thomas Jefferson’s “ Declaration of Independence is the first domino to fall in order to create the USA
    14·1 answer
  • By 1910 what percentage or the population immigration to the Union States was made up of Southern and Eastern Europeans
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the Egyptian priests welcome the Kings of Kush?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a characteristic of human geography?
    9·2 answers
  • Do you agree or disagree with Hamilton and Madison’s initial logic that the bill.of rights was essentially unnecessary ?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Compare status offender juveniles and juvenile delinquents?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me I don't know what it is.​
    5·2 answers
  • evaluate the content to weather all citizens in the song dynasty china expierenced a golden age during the song dynasty
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!