Answer: A
Step-by-step explanation: The question states that the change wasn't a positive one, it was a negative one as it states that the temperature changed an average of -2.250 Fahrenheit per hour. So, we multiply that by 3 to get -6.75. This is why A is correct.
<u>Explanation:</u>
1. a) Null hypothesis: There is <em>no</em> statistically significant relationship between the mouse grimace scale and the amount of pain felt by mouse.
b) Alternate hypothesis: There is a statistically-significant relationship between the mouse grimace scale and the amount of pain felt by mouse.
2. Yes, because a statistically significant data implies that there is sufficient evidence to believe the study, based on the results of the findings.
3. No, since the variables are different in this case. Here we are dealing with a non-painful solution so there may be no sample correlation as extreme as that found in the original study.
4. Possibly, because every hypothesis is an assumption until it is proven. Thus, in every statistical research, there may be different findings.
You can use the factors of the volumes 24, 27 and 48:
For example:
8 by 3 by 1 is a total volume of 24
or if you know that 4 times 2 is 8:
4 by 2 by 2
and so on
Answer:
149.85
Step-by-step explanation: brainliest pls
8x^2-5x-2
method
open bracket
6x^2-2x-3+x^2-3x+1
collect like terms
6x^2+2x^2-3-3x+1
8x^2-3-3x+1
again collect like terms
8x^2-2x-3x-3+1
8x^2-5x-3+1. (-×-=+ addition but keeping sign minus
8x-5x-2. (-×+=-)
