Answer:
3. Correctly ignored a sunk cost
Explanation:
Sunk costs refer to those costs which have been incurred in the past and which can no longer be recovered. For example, past expenditure on research and development with no current or future benefits represent sunk costs which can no longer be recovered.
Sunk costs are irrelevant for decision making process as they do not relate to current projects and yield no economic benefit.
In the given case, Manuel had already purchased a $10 movie ticket, which can neither be transferred nor eligible for a refund. Later when he does not exercise the option of going for the movie and opts for a concert instead, the amount of 10$ spent on the movie represents a sunk cost which is non recoverable.
“The federal
government awards technology development contracts to U.S. businesses” is an example of the
broad economic goal of growth.
Equity<span> <span>or </span>economic equality<span> is the concept or idea of fairness in </span>economics, particularly in regard to taxation or welfare economics.</span>
The correct answer between all
the choices given is the third choice or letter C. I am hoping that this answer
has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and
if you would like, feel free to ask another question.
<span> </span>
Answer:
A. average total cost is rising.
Explanation:
Whenever marginal cost is more than average cost it means it costs more to produce a unit now compared to the average cost of the previous units. Lets assume that a company produces 3 units of a good.
The first unit costs $1
The second unit costs $2
The third unit costs $3.
The average cost is (1+2+3)/3=2
Now if the marginal cost for producing a unit is more than the average cost for example if the marginal cost is 4, then this will mean that average total cost is rising. we can mathematically check this.
The first unit costs $1
The second unit costs $2
The third unit costs $3.
The fourth unit costs $4
Average cost= (1+2+3+4)/4=10/4=2.5
Here we see that the average cost increased from 2 to 2.5 because marginal cost was greater than average cost.
