1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makvit [3.9K]
3 years ago
15

A light source shines light consisting of two wavelengths, λ1 = 540 nm (green) and λ2 = 450 nm (blue), on two slits separated by

0.180 mm. The two overlapping interference patterns, one from each wavelength, are observed on a screen 1.53 m from the slits. What is the minimum distance (in cm) from the center of the screen to a point where a bright fringe of the green light coincides with a bright fringe of the blue light?
Physics
1 answer:
densk [106]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The maximun distance is  z_1 = z_2 = 0.0138m

Explanation:

    From the question we are told that

       The wavelength are  \lambda _ 1 = 540nm  (green) = 540 *10^{-9}m

                                           \lambda_2 = 450nm(blue) = 450 *10^{-9}m

        The distance of seperation of the two slit is d = 0.180mm = 0.180 *10^{-3}m

        The distance from the screen is D = 1.53m

Generally the distance of the bright fringe to the center of the screen is mathematically represented as

           z = \frac{m \lambda D}{d}

   Where m is  the order of the fringe

For the first wavelength  we have

        z_1 = \frac{m_1 (549 *10^{-9} * (1.53))}{0.180*10^{-3}}

             z_1=0.00459m_1 m

                 z_1= 4.6*10^{-3}m_1 m ----(1)

For the second  wavelength  we have              

        z_2 = m_2 \frac{450*10^{-9} * 1.53 }{0.180*10^{-3}}

        z_2 = 0.003825m_2

        z_2 = 3.825 *10^{-3} m_2 m  ----(2)

From the question we are told that the two sides coincides with one another so

            zy_1 =z_2

         4.6*10^{-3}m_1 m = 3.825 *10^{-3} m_2 m

          \frac{m_1}{m_2}  = \frac{3.825 *10^{-3}}{4.6*10^{-3}}

Hence for this equation to be solved

       m_1 = 3

and  m_2 = 4

Substituting this into the  equation

                      z_1 = z_2 = 3 * 4.6*10^{-3} = 4* 3.825*10^{-3}

      Hence z_1 = z_2 = 0.0138m

                       

You might be interested in
Can someone help me please? I’m so confused
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

what do you need help with? Like which type of print each image is?

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
If an object weighs 300 N on earth, what is it’s mass on the moon?
inna [77]

Answer:

The mass of the object on the Moon (and anywhere else) is about 30.61kg. Please see more detail below.

Explanation:

Weight is the gravitational force exerted on the object and is a function of mass and gravitational acceleration:

(weight) = (mass) x (gravitational acceleration)

We are to find the mass, knowing the weight on Earth to be 300N:

(mass) = (weight on Earth) / (gravitational acceleration on Earth) = 300N / 9.8 m/s^2 = 30.61 kg

The mass of the object is 30.61kg.

The mass of the object is independent of gravity. Therefore the answer to the question "What is its mass on the Moon" is 30.61kg.

If the question were what is its weight on the Moon, the answer would be

(weight on Moon) = (mass) x (grav.accel. on Moon) = 30.61kg x 1.62 m/s^2 = 49.59N

which is about 1/6 of the object's weight on the Earth.

4 0
3 years ago
A 0.5 kg basketball moving 5 m/s to the right collides with a 0.05 kg tennis
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

A. 1.4 m/s to the left

Explanation:

To solve this problem we must use the principle of conservation of momentum. Let's define the velocity signs according to the direction, if the velocity is to the right, a positive sign will be introduced into the equation, if the velocity is to the left, a negative sign will be introduced into the equation. Two moments will be analyzed in this equation. The moment before the collision and the moment after the collision. The moment before the collision is taken to the left of the equation and the moment after the collision to the right, so we have:

M_{before} = M_{after}

where:

M = momentum [kg*m/s]

M = m*v

where:

m = mass [kg]

v = velocity [m/s]

(m_{1} *v_{1} )-(m_{2} *v_{2})=(m_{1} *v_{3} )+(m_{2} *v_{4})

where:

m1 = mass of the basketball = 0.5 [kg]

v1 = velocity of the basketball before the collision = 5 [m/s]

m2 = mass of the tennis ball = 0.05 [kg]

v2 = velocity of the tennis ball before the collision = - 30 [m/s]

v3 =  velocity of the basketball after the collision [m/s]

v4 = velocity of the tennis ball after the collision = 34 [m/s]

Now replacing and solving:

(0.5*5) - (0.05*30) = (0.5*v3) + (0.05*34)

1 - (0.05*34) = 0.5*v3

- 0.7 = 0.5*v

v = - 1.4 [m/s]

The negative sign means that the movement is towards left

3 0
3 years ago
Which observation confused scientists regarding the photoelectric effect? A. Low-intensity light does not always cause electrons
e-lub [12.9K]
Light does not always cause electrons to be emitted.
If it doesn't, then you might think that making the light brighter
would cause electrons to be emitted. That DOESN't work, but
making the light higher FREQUENCY causes electrons to be
emitted !

Did you catch that ? ==> If you light a match next to a piece of metal, and the match burns with a red flame and NO electrons are emitted from the metal, then you can move in with a military searchlight or a ginormous high-power laser that has the same red color and shine it on the metal, and still no electrons will be emitted. But if you light a little match next to the metal and the match burns with a BLUE flame, then electrons WILL be emitted. Knocking electrons out of the metal has nothing to do with how strong and bright the light is. It only depends on the FREQUENCY (color) of the light !

This observation was confusing until the beginning of the 20th Century,
even to the smartest scientists. There was no way to explain it until 1905,
when Albert Einstein pretty much invented Quantum Mechanics to explain
this "Photoelectric Effect".

Of all of Einstein's great discoveries, THIS was the one for which he was
awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics ... in 1922. He never won a Nobel for
his theories of Relativity.
3 0
3 years ago
What is an object’s acceleration due to gravity on earth?
andriy [413]

Question: What is an object’s acceleration due to gravity on earth?

Answer: acceleration due to gravity is a vector

Explanation: vector has both a magnitude and a direction

question answered by

(jacemorris04)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read each scenario and then answer the question. Scenario A: A 6-kg bucket is raised a distance of 6 m. Scenario B: A 9-kg bucke
    15·2 answers
  • There are two forces on the 2 kg box in the overhead view of the following figure, but only one is shown. For F1=20N, a= 12 m/s2
    11·1 answer
  • Can pockets of vacuum persist in an ideal gas? Assume that a room is filled with air at 20∘C and that somehow a small spherical
    5·1 answer
  • How long does it take for the ball to hit the wall?<br> At what height does the ball hit the wall?
    7·1 answer
  • Solo 189
    13·1 answer
  • A bubble, located 0.200 m beneath the surface in a glass of beer, rises to the top. The air pressure at the top is 1.01x10⁵ Pa.
    13·1 answer
  • Two point charges totaling 8 μC exert a repulsive force of 0.15 N on one another when separated by 0.5 m. What is the charge on
    7·1 answer
  • A metre rule is used to measure the length of a piece of string in a certain experiment. It is found to be 20 cm long to the nea
    6·1 answer
  • I believe the answer is D but wanted to make sure.
    9·2 answers
  • Susie blows up a balloon. First, she places the balloon in a bucket of ice water. She observes the balloon. She then removes the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!