Self-criticism can be a constructive mechanism of self-improvement and self-reflection, but it also can be very destructive. In the age of social media, we constantly have access to other peoples lives and can not help but to compare. It is all good, until this analyzing becomes more agressive towards one self. For example, 'oh, they are vacationing at such a nice place' goes to 'I am so stupid, I can never earn so much money to afford such a vacation'. Not everyone have a highly developed self-esteem, then this self-criticism becomes hard to handle and can even turn into constant anxiety and even depression. One of the most prominent self-criticizing has to do with the self-image or appearance. People want to look good and also stand out. This balace is hard to achieve. Sometimes people go as far as immitating the 'idol' or the person they think looks perfect. By self-criticizing you are almost denying your personal traits, and wanting to look like someone else. It all comes down to self-acceptance and controling your self-criticizm. If you try to look at yourself more objectively, you will have healty self-criticism that will help you improve.
Answer:1.how different were the cultures of Native Americans and European settlers 2.Compare the Native American view of land ownership with the European view of land ownership. 3.How did the English feel that this difference was justification to take the lands of Native Americans 4.How did this difference serve as justification for the Europeans to take Native American land 5.How did the European view of wealth become justification to take Native American lands
Explanation: My in
h00drichxkidd
That statement is false
According to conflict theorists, there would never be a perfect society where every individual have an exact social standing. No religious establishments can change the situation.
People would always be in a constant state of competition in because we have to compete for a limited amount of resources in the society. Those who obtain most resources would be the one that have higher social standing and able to secure their survival.
Answer:
1. new ideas around the government and basic life change
2. economy= democrats support move government spending instead of military spendings, while republicans see it the opposite way. Democrats also believe that people with more money should be paying higher taxes.
National security=republicans believe that they have a right to be secure in their home and want the government to pay more money for the U.S. security system. Democrats have a very similar view to the republicans though.
3. Some parties may secretly receive big fundings from support groups and parties/candidates can buy votes instead of winning them fairly
4. liberalism, conservatism, libertarianism and populism/half of them are seen as independent(moderate, libertarians) and half of them would prefer the government to a limit(liberal, conservative). They all have different views on the government and what they should do but they all
Explanation:
Explanation:
The literal definition of institution is "a society or organization founded for a religious, educational, social, or similar purpose." In saying that they all have a cause they stand behind. In the US politicians are often influenced by lobbyist. Depending on how well an institution can lobby will determine how drastict the influence they have on politics.