Answer:
Rights and duties are closely related and cannot be separated from one another. Both go side by side. These are the two sides of the same coin. If the state gives the right to life to a citizen, it also imposes an obligation on him to not to expose his life to dangers, as well as to respect the life of others.
Explanation:
Please marke me as brainlist
Answer:
c. Media reports of information often leave out details about the nature of the sample used in a given study.
Explanation:
Here Haley rushes to make conclusions based on what she read from the magazine without considering the missing information from the reports in the magazine- no information on how study was conducted such as the nature of sample used in the study to make conclusions that people who drink coffee are smarter than people who don't.
I believe the answer is: <span>concrete operational
During the concrete operational stage, the children already started to develop the congitive ability to perform logical thinking.
This would granted them the ability for basic reasoning in determining the causal-effect relationship in a certain event</span>
Answer:
Stay with her current partner until her alternatives improve
Explanation:
According to the interpendence theory, People's decision to form a relationship with another person is heavily influenced on the cost and benefit that they expect to get from that person.
This theory conveys that people could abandon a relationship with a person in order to form a relationship with another if those people perceive that the benefit that they get from the new person is higher than the old ones.
So, if this theory is implemented to Rhonda's situation, she will most likely Stay with her current partner until her alternatives improve.
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
